PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen Price

PLAY
$12,73
+$0,43(+%3,49)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-27 15:27 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-27 15:27, Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is priced at $12,73, with a total market cap of $428,33M, a P/E ratio of -13,83, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $12,33 and $12,78. The current price is %3,24 above the day's low and %0,39 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1,59M. Over the past 52 weeks, PLAY has traded between $11,52 to $15,02, and the current price is -%15,24 away from the 52-week high.

PLAY Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$12,70
Market Cap$428,33M
Volume1,59M
P/E Ratio-13,83
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Dividend Amount$0,16
Diluted EPS (TTM)1,41
Net Income (FY)-$48,70M
Revenue (FY)$2,10B
Earnings Date2026-06-09
EPS Estimate0,61
Revenue Estimate$582,14M
Shares Outstanding33,72M
Beta (1Y)1.832
Ex-Dividend Date2020-01-09
Dividend Payment Date2020-02-10

About PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. owns and operates entertainment and dining venues for adults and families in North America. Its venues offer a menu of entrées and appetizers, as well as a selection of non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages; and an assortment of entertainment attractions centered on playing games and watching live sports, and other televised events. The company operates its venues under the Dave & Buster's name. As of January 30, 2022, it owned and operated 144 stores located in 40 states, Puerto Rico, and one Canadian Province. The company was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Coppell, Texas.
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryEntertainment
CEOTarun Lal
HeadquartersCoppell,TX,US
Employees (FY)23,61K
Average Revenue (1Y)$89,06K
Net Income per Employee-$2,06K

Learn More about Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) FAQ

What's the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) today?

x
Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is currently trading at $12,73, with a 24h change of +%3,49. The 52-week trading range is $11,52–$15,02.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

Should you buy or sell Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

How to buy Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) Latest News

2026-04-24 18:42

Major CEX Launches Crypto Payment Card on Mastercard Network in Australia, Enabling USDC Payments

Gate News message, April 24 — A leading centralized exchange has launched a crypto payment card in Australia, partnering with Mastercard and Immersve to enable crypto-backed payments at merchants accepting Mastercard, including Google Play and Apple Pay. The service supports USDC and 37 USDC trading pairs, with digital assets converted to fiat currency at checkout before Mastercard settlement. Users can earn up to 2% cashback on transactions based on their VIP tier and trading volume. The product is currently virtual-only, with no physical card or ATM access at this stage. The initiative reflects the exchange's commitment to real-world crypto utility and trust-first infrastructure. The CEO stated that the partnership increases Mastercard acceptance among Australian users while ensuring user protections and clear compliance standards. The product builds on the exchange's AUSTRAC DCE registration, demonstrating commitment to responsible innovation. The Australian Managing Director noted that utility is the turning point for digital asset adoption, and the card connects digital assets to real commerce through a familiar Mastercard experience. Jerom Faury, CEO of Immersve, described the collaboration as a major step toward mainstream adoption of digital assets for everyday purchases, calling it a "game-changer." Christina Rau, Senior Vice President of Digital Commercialization at Mastercard, emphasized the partnership reflects the company's commitment to responsible Web3 innovation and enabling safe, compliant spending of digital assets at scale. Axis One Markets Pty Ltd is authorized to provide certain financial services on behalf of Immersve, while the card is issued solely by Immersve. Users are advised to review the relevant disclosure documents including the Product Disclosure Statement, Financial Services Guide, and Target Market Determination before using the service. Immersve affirms adherence to Australian anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing standards.

2026-04-24 00:41

PvX Partners Raises $10.5M Series A Led by T-Accelerate Capital

Gate News message, April 24 — PvX Partners completed a $10.5 million Series A funding round on April 23, led by T-Accelerate Capital with participation from Z Venture Capital, Drive by DraftKings, Play Ventures, and General Catalyst. The company has committed over $750 million in user acquisition financing to date, including $500 million deployed in the past two quarters through its Lambda machine learning underwriting platform. The new capital will support hiring and technology development as PvX expands deal volume amid tightening venture funding in sectors like gaming. PvX operates a "non-dilutive" cohort financing model where repayment is tied to revenue generated by newly acquired app users rather than fixed loan payments. App developers repay principal plus a capped share of revenue from user cohorts, with PvX bearing downside risk if campaigns underperform. Once PvX reaches its return cap, app developers retain all future cash flow from those cohorts. This approach addresses limitations in traditional venture debt, which often includes EBITDA-based covenants that can penalize companies for increased marketing spend. By separating growth funding from equity dilution, developers can preserve ownership for riskier initiatives like new game development while using performance-based financing to scale proven marketing channels.

2026-04-23 07:02

AI-Powered Web3 Games Take Center Stage as BuidlHack Seoul Crowns 'Bank or Plank' Champion

Gate News message, April 23 — YGG Play and Verse8 announced Bank or Plank as the winner of BuidlHack 2026's Casual Degen track, with 120 teams competing to build playable crypto-native games using AI tools in Seoul during Korea BUIDL Week. Bank or Plank, a 3D multiplayer pirate board game created by solo developer Wabbs, won first place after being built and tested in under a month. The game challenges players to gather and bank gold within a 5-minute time limit before adverse events cause them to lose their loot. Dungeon Raising, an idle action game, placed second, while Gas Wars, Black Hole Survivor, and Attack on Idol tied for third place. Winning teams shared a US$5,000 prize pool and will receive ongoing support through Verse8's creator ecosystem, with standout projects considered for YGG Play publishing. The hackathon culminated with a final showcase on April 18, following an in-person Builder Day on April 14, where teams refined game mechanics with industry operators. Gabby Dizon, co-founder of Yield Guild Games and one of the judges, noted that demand for Casual Degen experiences is strong, particularly among non-gamers, and that the quality and creativity of entries demonstrated the model could be repeatable and sustainable for Web3 games long-term.

2026-04-22 06:41

Sunny Side Labs Launches Privacy Boost, Enterprise Privacy Solution for Optimism Mainnet

Gate News message, April 22 — Sunny Side Labs, a Layer 2 infrastructure provider, unveiled Privacy Boost, an enterprise-focused privacy solution, on April 21. The solution is now available on Optimism Mainnet and will be prioritized for enterprise and institutional customers. Privacy Boost is an SDK-based solution designed to address the structural limitations of public blockchains, where transaction amounts, addresses, and balances are publicly visible. The solution combines zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and trusted execution environments (TEE), incorporating selective disclosure functionality that allows regulators or auditors to access only necessary information. According to Sunny Side Labs, this approach simultaneously achieves both privacy protection and regulatory compliance. The solution is offered in SDK form, enabling customers to implement privacy features with simple code additions, requiring no cryptographic expertise. Sunny Side Labs and Optimism have been collaborating to enhance the Optimism Mainnet since November 2025.

2026-04-21 15:41

Arthur Hayes: I'll Believe in XRP's Use at Scale When I See On-Chain Evidence

Gate News message, April 21 — Arthur Hayes recently stated he will only believe Ripple supporters' claims about XRP being used as cross-border settlement infrastructure when he sees on-chain evidence of institutions deploying it at scale. Speaking to Coinpedia, Hayes applied the same evidentiary standard to reports of Iran using Bitcoin to collect tolls on oil tankers, saying: "I'll believe Iran is charging a toll in Bitcoin when I see a transaction linked to a vessel's toll payment." According to Hamid Hosseini, spokesman for Iran's Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Products Exporters' Union, the toll system requires tankers to email Iranian authorities with cargo details in advance. Once cleared, a toll of $1 per barrel is assessed, with empty tankers allowed free passage. Payments must be made within seconds using Bitcoin, chosen to avoid tracking or confiscation under international sanctions. The toll system is designed to function independently of traditional financial infrastructure. Jim Rickards, who helped construct the petrodollar system in the 1970s, recently cited Ripple alongside Bitcoin and Tether as plausible currencies for Iran's reported Strait of Hormuz toll collections, underscoring the broader narrative of a parallel financial system emerging in crypto markets.

Hot Posts About Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

SoominStar

SoominStar

15 minutes ago
#IranProposesHormuzStraitReopeningTerms The latest diplomatic signals surrounding the Strait of Hormuz are not just another chapter in a long-running geopolitical story they represent a moment where strategy, economics, and global market psychology are colliding in real time. What we are witnessing is not a simple negotiation over a waterway, but a layered power struggle where timing, leverage, and narrative control matter just as much as military capability. Iran’s proposal to reopen the strait under specific conditions introduces a new tone to the conflict one that blends calculated flexibility with underlying firmness. At the center of this development is a reported multi-point framework delivered through Pakistani mediation. The essence of the proposal is clear: prioritize immediate de-escalation by reopening the Strait of Hormuz and addressing the naval blockade first, while pushing more complex issues like nuclear negotiations further down the timeline. This sequencing is not accidental. It reflects a strategic attempt by Iran to reshape the negotiation structure moving from high-friction ideological disputes to practical, immediate concerns that impact global trade and energy stability. This shift reveals something deeper about Iran’s current posture. Rather than approaching the situation through rigid ideological positioning, Tehran appears to be experimenting with phased diplomacy. By separating urgent economic and logistical issues from long-term geopolitical disputes, it creates space for partial agreements. That alone increases the probability of short-term breakthroughs, even if a comprehensive resolution remains distant. However, the Strait of Hormuz itself is far more than a bargaining chip. It is one of the most critical arteries of global energy supply, and any disruption sends shockwaves through oil markets, shipping routes, and ultimately the broader global economy. When access to such a strategic chokepoint becomes conditional, it introduces a layer of uncertainty that markets struggle to fully price in. This is why even temporary closures or threats of disruption have outsized effects compared to other geopolitical flashpoints. The United States response, while measured, highlights the complexity of the situation. On one hand, there is acknowledgment that Iran’s proposal could serve as a starting point for negotiation. On the other hand, Washington’s insistence on an unconditional reopening of the strait reflects a fundamentally different framing of the issue. For the US, freedom of navigation is non-negotiable. For Iran, it is a lever tied directly to broader economic and military pressure, particularly the naval blockade affecting its ports. This mismatch in priorities is where the real tension lies. Both sides are not just negotiating terms they are negotiating the order in which those terms should be addressed. And in diplomacy, sequencing often determines outcomes. Whoever controls the sequence controls the leverage. Adding to the complexity is the fragile nature of the current ceasefire environment. Temporary pauses in escalation have created windows for dialogue, but they have not resolved the underlying conflict. Each extension, each delay in military action, buys time—but it also increases the stakes. Both sides are effectively testing how far they can push without triggering a full-scale breakdown. Iran’s messaging reinforces this ambiguity. By stating that agreeing to a ceasefire does not equate to ending the conflict, it maintains strategic pressure while still participating in negotiations. This dual-track approach talking while signaling readiness for escalation keeps the situation fluid and unpredictable. Meanwhile, market participants are trying to interpret these developments through the lens of risk and opportunity. Traditionally, geopolitical instability drives capital toward safe-haven assets like gold. But the current cycle is challenging that assumption in a noticeable way. Bitcoin’s performance during this period stands out as one of the most intriguing aspects of the entire situation. Instead of behaving like a high-risk asset that suffers during uncertainty, it has shown resilience and in some cases, outright strength. The relative outperformance against gold is not just a short-term anomaly; it hints at a broader shift in how digital assets are perceived in times of crisis. This shift is rooted in multiple factors. First, Bitcoin operates outside traditional financial systems. It is not directly tied to any government, central bank, or geopolitical alliance. In a scenario where traditional systems are under stress, that independence becomes a feature rather than a limitation. Second, the growing institutional presence in the crypto market has added a layer of stability that did not exist in previous cycles. When large capital allocators begin treating Bitcoin as part of a diversified macro strategy rather than a speculative bet, its behavior changes. It becomes less reactive to short-term shocks and more aligned with long-term capital flows. This is exactly what appears to be unfolding in the current environment. At the same time, gold’s recent pullback does not necessarily indicate weakness in the asset itself. Instead, it suggests a rotation of capital. After a strong upward move over the past year, some investors may be reallocating into assets that offer higher growth potential, especially in a market environment where liquidity conditions are still evolving. Oil markets, on the other hand, remain highly sensitive to every headline. Prices continue to fluctuate within a volatile range, reflecting the constant tension between supply risks and diplomatic progress. Even the possibility of a sustained reopening of the Strait of Hormuz introduces downward pressure on oil, while any hint of renewed disruption pushes prices higher almost immediately. This interplay between geopolitics and markets creates a complex environment for traders. It is not enough to rely on technical analysis alone, nor is it sufficient to focus solely on macro narratives. The current landscape demands a hybrid approach one that integrates geopolitical awareness with market structure and sentiment analysis. From a trading perspective, Bitcoin’s current positioning presents both opportunity and caution. The recent upward momentum suggests strong demand, but shorter timeframes indicate that the market may be approaching overextended conditions. This is a classic scenario where trend continuation and short-term corrections coexist. Key levels in the market act as psychological anchors. Support zones represent areas where buyers are willing to step in, while resistance levels reflect points where selling pressure increases. When price approaches these zones, the reaction often determines the next phase of movement. A clean breakout above resistance can trigger momentum-driven buying, while rejection can lead to consolidation or pullbacks. In the current context, traders need to remain flexible. A continuation of bullish momentum could lead to rapid upside expansion, especially if short positions are forced to close. At the same time, any negative geopolitical development could quickly reverse sentiment, leading to sharp corrections. Risk management becomes the defining factor in navigating such conditions. Position sizing, stop-loss placement, and diversification are not optional—they are essential. The unpredictability of geopolitical events means that even well-structured trades can be disrupted by external factors. For longer-term participants, the strategy often shifts from timing the market to managing exposure. Gradual accumulation during periods of weakness allows investors to build positions without relying on precise entry points. This approach reduces emotional decision-making and aligns more closely with long-term trends. Ethereum and other major digital assets also play a role in this broader narrative. While Bitcoin often leads in terms of market direction, altcoins can provide additional opportunities, particularly during phases of strong overall momentum. However, they also carry higher volatility, which requires careful allocation. Beyond individual assets, the macro environment continues to shape the direction of the market. Monetary policy, global liquidity, and institutional behavior all interact with geopolitical developments to create a constantly evolving landscape. No single factor operates in isolation. The role of institutional capital is particularly important. Continued inflows into crypto-related investment vehicles provide a foundation that can support prices even during periods of uncertainty. This underlying demand acts as a buffer, reducing the severity of downturns and reinforcing long-term trends. At the same time, it is important to avoid overconfidence in any single narrative. Markets are dynamic, and conditions can change بسرعة. What appears to be a strong trend today can shift quickly if underlying assumptions are challenged. Returning to the geopolitical dimension, the path forward remains uncertain. While there is a clear incentive for both sides to avoid escalation, the differences in their core demands are not trivial. Bridging these gaps will require not just negotiation, but compromise and compromise is often the hardest part of diplomacy. Pakistan’s role as a mediator adds an interesting layer to the process. Acting as an intermediary, it provides a channel for communication that might otherwise be constrained. This kind of involvement can help reduce misunderstandings and facilitate incremental progress, even if major breakthroughs remain elusive. Ultimately, the Strait of Hormuz situation is a reminder of how interconnected the modern world has become. A regional conflict can influence global energy markets, which in turn affect inflation, monetary policy, and investment decisions across continents. In this chain reaction, crypto markets have carved out their own position not as isolated entities, but as integrated components of the broader financial system. For traders and investors, the challenge is not just to react to events, but to interpret them within a larger framework. Understanding the motivations behind geopolitical moves, the behavior of institutional capital, and the psychology of market participants provides a more complete picture. The coming weeks will likely be defined by continued negotiation, intermittent tension, and market adjustments. Each headline will contribute to shaping sentiment, but the deeper trends will be driven by structural factors capital flows, technological adoption, and evolving perceptions of value. In this environment, patience and clarity become powerful tools. Chasing every move or reacting to every development can lead to inconsistency. Instead, maintaining a structured approach grounded in analysis and disciplined execution offers a more sustainable path. What makes this moment particularly significant is not just the immediate outcome of negotiations, but the precedent it sets. How global powers handle strategic chokepoints, how markets respond to prolonged uncertainty, and how emerging asset classes behave under stress all of these factors will influence future scenarios. The story is still unfolding. The negotiations are ongoing. The markets are adapting. And within this dynamic interplay, opportunities will continue to emerge for those who are prepared to understand rather than simply react.
0
0
0
0
failed_dev_successful_ape

failed_dev_successful_ape

18 minutes ago
Been thinking about crypto selloffs lately, and honestly, it's one of those market dynamics everyone should understand before their portfolio gets hit. So what exactly is a crypto selloff? Basically, it's when a large chunk of the market suddenly decides to dump their holdings, triggering a cascade of selling that tanks prices. Sounds simple, but the ripple effects are massive. We're talking bear markets, panic spreading through communities, and innovation grinding to a halt. On the flip side though, if you've got dry powder, these moments can be absolute gold for accumulating at discounts. The whole crypto selloff thing really became a thing after Bitcoin peaked in late 2017. That crash was brutal, and ever since, we've seen periodic selloffs become just part of the game. The triggers vary wildly depending on what's happening in the world. Let me break down what actually causes these crypto selloffs. There's the macro stuff - regulatory crackdowns, economic recessions, big geopolitical events. Then there's the micro level - individual project drama, tokenomics issues, community sentiment tanking. I've seen both play out. Regulatory pressure is probably the most direct hit. When governments start banning crypto or restricting trading, investors panic and bail. Remember May 2021 when China cracked down on Bitcoin mining? Bitcoin dropped around 30% in response. That's the kind of regulatory shock that triggers immediate selloffs. Then you've got macro economic conditions. Global recession or financial crisis? Investors flee to safer assets and crypto gets dumped first. It's like watching money rotate out in real time. Technological shifts can trigger crypto selloffs too. If some new blockchain tech emerges that makes current holdings look obsolete, people start rotating. FOMO works both ways - fear of missing out on the new thing can cause massive selling of the old. What's interesting is how institutional investors have changed the game. They're not retail traders panic-selling at the bottom anymore. Institutional crypto selloffs now move entire markets. We also see how DeFi and stablecoins are reshaping how these selloffs play out and propagate through the ecosystem. Looking back at the data: February 2021 saw profit-taking hit Bitcoin hard, down over 20% in a week. March 2020 was wild - COVID-19 uncertainty caused Bitcoin to literally halve in a single day. These weren't theoretical events, they actually happened and taught us lessons. The real play here is staying sharp. You can't predict crypto selloffs with certainty, but you can watch the indicators. Keep your eyes on regulatory news, macro trends, and on-chain data. Understanding what triggers a crypto selloff and how it ripples through the market - that's what separates investors who survive downturns from those who get liquidated. The key is being prepared. Whether that's hedging your positions, keeping some cash ready to buy the dip, or just knowing when to take profits. That's how you turn market chaos into opportunity.
0
0
0
0