PEG

Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG Price

PEG
$80,33
-$0,41(-%0,50)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-27 19:27 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-27 19:27, Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) is priced at $80,33, with a total market cap of $40,30B, a P/E ratio of 18,98, and a dividend yield of %3,17. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $80,26 and $81,25. The current price is %0,08 above the day's low and %1,13 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1,81M. Over the past 52 weeks, PEG has traded between $78,01 to $84,44, and the current price is -%4,86 away from the 52-week high.

PEG Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$80,16
Market Cap$40,30B
Volume1,81M
P/E Ratio18,98
Dividend Yield (TTM)%3,17
Dividend Amount$0,67
Diluted EPS (TTM)4,23
Net Income (FY)$2,11B
Revenue (FY)$12,16B
Earnings Date2026-05-05
EPS Estimate1,44
Revenue Estimate$3,35B
Shares Outstanding502,76M
Beta (1Y)0.598
Ex-Dividend Date2026-06-09
Dividend Payment Date2026-06-30

About PEG

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, through its subsidiaries, operates as an energy company primarily in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States. It operates through two segments, PSE&G and PSEG Power. The PSE&G segment transmits electricity; distributes electricity and gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers, as well as invests in solar generation projects, and energy efficiency and related programs; and offers appliance services and repairs. As of December 31, 2021, it had electric transmission and distribution system of 25,000 circuit miles and 862,000 poles; 56 switching stations with an installed capacity of 39,353 megavolt-amperes (MVA), and 235 substations with an installed capacity of 9,285 MVA; four electric distribution headquarters and five electric sub-headquarters; and 18,000 miles of gas mains, 12 gas distribution headquarters, two sub-headquarters, and one meter shop, as well as 58 natural gas metering and regulating stations. Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated was incorporated in 1985 and is based in Newark, New Jersey.
SectorUtilities
IndustryRegulated Electric
CEORalph A. LaRossa
HeadquartersNewark,NJ,US

Learn More about Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)

Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) FAQ

What's the stock price of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) today?

x
Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) is currently trading at $80,33, with a 24h change of -%0,50. The 52-week trading range is $78,01–$84,44.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

Should you buy or sell Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

How to buy Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) Latest News

2026-04-27 02:41

Litecoin Executes Deep Chain Reorganization to Undo MWEB Privacy Layer Exploit

Gate News message, April 27 — Litecoin underwent a deep chain reorganization on Saturday (April 26) after attackers exploited a zero-day vulnerability in its MimbleWimble Extension Block (MWEB) privacy layer, the Litecoin Foundation announced. The reorg spanned blocks 3,095,930 to 3,095,943 and took over three hours to complete. The vulnerability allowed mining nodes running outdated software to validate unauthorized MWEB transactions, enabling attackers to extract coins from the privacy extension and route them to cross-chain swapping protocols via peg-out transactions. Mining pools were simultaneously targeted with denial-of-service attacks exploiting the same flaw. During the reorganization window, attackers executed double-spend attacks against multiple protocols, including NEAR Intents, which suffered approximately $600,000 in losses. The Litecoin Foundation confirmed that all offending transactions were erased from the network's history, with valid transactions during that period unaffected. The vulnerability has been fully patched. LTC traded near $56.00 at the time of disclosure, down roughly 1% on the day and 25% year-to-date, with no immediate sharp market reaction reported. Saturday's incident marks the first known attack targeting MWEB since Litecoin activated the privacy extension via soft fork in May 2022. MWEB enables users to move LTC from the transparent base chain into a confidential side-chain through peg-in and peg-out transactions. The Foundation did not disclose the total amount of unauthorized LTC created or name the affected mining pools. The attack underscores ongoing security challenges across the crypto industry, with DeFi protocols suffering over $750 million in losses through mid-April 2026, including the $292 million Kelp DAO bridge exploit and the $285 million Drift attack.

2026-04-26 20:13

Litecoin Suffers Deep Chain Reorganization After MWEB Privacy Layer Zero-Day Exploit

Gate News message, April 26 — Litecoin underwent a deep chain reorganization on Saturday afternoon after attackers exploited a zero-day vulnerability in its MimbleWimble Extension Block (MWEB) privacy layer, according to the Litecoin Foundation. The bug allowed mining nodes running older software to validate unauthorized MWEB transactions, enabling attackers to peg coins out of the privacy extension and route them to third-party decentralized exchanges. The chain reorg ran from block 3,095,930 to 3,095,943 and took more than three hours to complete. During this period, attackers performed double-spend attacks against multiple cross-chain swapping protocols that had accepted the now-orphaned MWEB peg-outs. Aurora Labs CEO Alex Shevchenko characterized it as a "coordinated attack" and noted that NEAR Intents faced approximately $600k in exposure. The Foundation confirmed the vulnerability has been fully patched and the offending transactions have been erased from Litecoin's history, while valid transactions during the period remain unaffected. Saturday's incident marks the first known attack targeting MWEB since Litecoin activated the privacy extension via soft fork in May 2022. LTC traded near $56 on Saturday afternoon, down about 1% on the day and showing no immediate market reaction, though the token is down nearly 25% year-to-date. The incident occurs amid a challenging period for crypto security, with DeFi protocols losing over $750 million to exploits in 2026 through mid-April.

2026-04-19 19:01

Kelp DAO Bridge Exploit Results in $293M Mint, Leaves Aave With Over $200M in Bad Debt

Gate News message, April 19 — On April 18 at 17:35 UTC, an attacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp DAO's LayerZero-powered cross-chain bridge, releasing 116,500 rsETH (approximately $293 million and roughly 18% of the token's circulating supply) to an attacker-controlled wallet without corresponding ETH being locked. The attacker then deposited the unbacked rsETH into Aave V3 and V4 as collateral, borrowing real wrapped ether (WETH) against it. By the time Kelp's emergency multisig froze the protocol 46 minutes later, the WETH had been withdrawn. The bridge vulnerability allowed the attacker to submit a crafted message that passed verification checks despite no actual deposit on the source chain. Two follow-up attempts at 18:26 and 18:28 UTC to drain an additional 40,000 rsETH each were reverted after the pause was activated. Aave now carries between $177 million and $236 million in bad debt, concentrated in the rsETH/WETH pair on Ethereum. The platform's total value locked (TVL) dropped approximately $6 billion, WETH market utilization hit 100% (preventing further withdrawals), and AAVE token declined over 18%. Aave's Umbrella insurance fund holds about $50 million, leaving a significant gap. The borrow positions are effectively unliquidatable as rsETH collateral cannot be redeemed and will not trade near peg once the unbacked supply is fully recognized. SparkLend, Fluid, and Upshift paused or froze rsETH within hours; Morpho's isolated market architecture limited exposure to approximately $1 million across two markets. rsETH across 20-plus chains now faces backing uncertainty until Kelp publishes a reconciliation of reserves against outstanding supply. This exploit marks the largest DeFi incident of 2026, with cumulative DeFi losses for the year reaching between $450 million and $482 million across roughly 45 protocols.

Hot Posts About Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)

DragonFlyOfficial

DragonFlyOfficial

2 hours ago
#AaveLaunchesrsETHRecoveryPlan Aave has officially moved to stabilize the rsETH ecosystem after the recent exploit shock by launching a coordinated recovery plan and dedicated fund. 🚨 What Happened The issue began after the April 18 rsETH / KelpDAO bridge exploit, which created a major collateral shortfall across DeFi lending markets and put pressure on Aave pools. To respond, Aave and ecosystem partners launched “DeFi United”, a recovery initiative focused on restoring 100% asset backing for rsETH. 💰 Recovery Fund Highlights • Aave DAO proposal: 25,000 ETH contribution • Mantle credit line: 30,000 ETH • Additional support from Lido, EtherFi, Ethena, and others • Further backing from Consensys and Joe Lubin up to 30,000 ETH 📊 Why This Matters This is more than a bailout. It is a major DeFi stress test. Aave is trying to: • protect lenders and borrowers • restore rsETH peg confidence • reduce bad debt risk • prevent contagion across Ethereum and Arbitrum markets ⚠️ Risk Warning The recovery still depends on: • DAO governance votes • release of frozen funds • successful bridge reopening • execution of technical fixes Any delay in these steps can keep AAVE, ETH, and restaking tokens highly volatile. 🎯 My Honest Trading View This is bullish for system confidence, but not automatically bullish for price. Watch: • AAVE reaction near support • rsETH peg restoration • governance vote outcomes • ETH liquidity across lending pools If the plan executes smoothly, market confidence can recover fast.
4
3
0
1
SoominStar

SoominStar

3 hours ago
#AaveLaunchesrsETHRecoveryPlan 🚨 DeFi’s Defining Stress Test of 2026 — A Crisis That Rewrote the Rules, Not the Future April 18, 2026 wasn’t just another date on the crypto calendar. It was the kind of day that forces an entire industry to look in the mirror. What unfolded around rsETH wasn’t a routine exploit or a short-lived panic it was a full-scale stress test of decentralized finance itself. The kind of moment where systems either crack… or prove why they exist in the first place. And surprisingly or maybe not, if you’ve been paying attention DeFi didn’t collapse. It adapted in real time. ⚠️ The Incident That Shook Confidence — But Not Foundations At the heart of this event was a vulnerability inside KelpDAO’s LayerZero V2 bridge — specifically a dangerously weak verification setup. The attacker didn’t need complex multi-layer exploits or months of stealth. A simple but critical flaw — a 1-of-1 verifier — was enough to open the door. What followed was aggressive and calculated. Around 116,500 rsETH tokens were minted out of thin air — completely unbacked. On paper, that translated to nearly $292 million in synthetic value, injected into the ecosystem without real collateral behind it. But the real danger wasn’t just the minting. It was what came next. The attacker moved quickly, deploying these freshly minted tokens into Aave V3, one of DeFi’s most trusted lending platforms. By using rsETH as collateral, they began borrowing highly liquid assets like WETH and stETH. This is where the situation turned critical. Because once fake collateral enters a lending protocol, the risk doesn’t stay isolated — it spreads. Health factors weaken. Liquidation thresholds get dangerously close. And if the collateral collapses, the protocol itself can be left holding bad debt. In this case, the potential exposure wasn’t small. It was estimated to reach up to $230 million if rsETH lost its peg entirely. 🔍 The Hidden Detail Most People Missed A lot of panic came from misunderstanding one key point: not all rsETH was broken. The Ethereum mainnet version of rsETH remained properly backed. The issue was specifically tied to tokens minted through Layer 2 bridging — where the backing ratio dropped drastically. At one point, coverage fell to around 26%, leaving a massive gap between circulating tokens and actual reserves. That gap wasn’t theoretical — it was real, measurable, and dangerous. This distinction matters because it highlights something deeper: 👉 In DeFi, not all versions of an asset carry equal risk — even if they share the same name. And that’s a lesson many traders only learn the hard way. ⚡ Aave’s Response — Calm, Calculated, and Immediate Here’s where things could have gone very differently. In centralized finance, delays, miscommunication, or hidden liabilities often turn crises into disasters. But Aave didn’t hesitate. There was no waiting for meetings, no PR spin, no confusion. The protocol executed exactly as it was designed to: rsETH markets were instantly frozen Loan-to-Value ratios were set to zero Borrowing activity was halted completely Risk exposure was contained within hours This wasn’t luck. It was preparation. And more importantly, it proved something many critics still doubt: 👉 Well-designed DeFi protocols don’t need human intervention to survive — they’re built to respond automatically. That level of precision under pressure is rare, even in traditional finance. m 🤝 DeFi United — Competition Paused, Survival Prioritized What happened next might be the most important part of the entire story. Instead of fragmentation, fear, and blame — the ecosystem did something unexpected. It coordinated. Major players across DeFi — including staking platforms, infrastructure providers, and liquidity protocols — aligned toward a single goal: stabilizing the system. This wasn’t about protecting individual brands. It was about protecting the entire ecosystem’s credibility. Over $160 million was quickly mobilized toward a $200 million recovery target. Funding came from DAO treasuries, ecosystem partners, and even direct contributions from influential figures within the space. Think about that for a second. In a permissionless, decentralized environment — where competition is fierce — protocols chose collaboration over advantage. That’s not weakness. That’s maturity. 📊 Market Reaction — Fear, Then Resilience Naturally, the market didn’t stay calm at first. There was volatility. Sharp, fast, emotional. Total Value Locked (TVL) dropped by around $13 billion rsETH briefly lost its peg under heavy pressure Lending markets tightened as risk perceptions shifted But here’s what stood out: 👉 The recovery was faster than expected. Ethereum held relatively stable, hovering in the $2,300–$2,400 range. AAVE saw a dip, but quickly rebounded toward the $91–$95 zone. This wasn’t blind optimism. It was selective confidence. The market punished weak links — but continued to trust strong infrastructure. And that distinction is everything. 🧠 What This Event Really Taught Us Beyond the headlines and numbers, this incident exposed deeper structural truths about DeFi. The kind that serious participants can’t afford to ignore. 1. Bridges Are Still the Weakest Link Cross-chain infrastructure remains one of the most fragile layers in crypto. When validation systems are too centralized or poorly designed, they become single points of failure. 2. Collateral ≠ Equal Risk Yield-bearing assets might look attractive, but their underlying structure matters. Synthetic or bridged assets introduce layers of risk that aren’t always visible at first glance. 3. Liquidity Is Conditional In calm markets, liquidity feels infinite. But under stress, it disappears fast. What seems safe during normal conditions can become highly unstable in minutes. 4. Risk Travels Fast in DeFi Because everything is interconnected, one exploit doesn’t stay isolated. It can ripple across protocols, chains, and asset classes almost instantly. 🔥 My Take — This Was Growth, Not Failure It’s easy to label events like this as “failures.” But that’s a shallow view. If anything, this was proof that DeFi is evolving exactly the way resilient systems should. Compare this to centralized collapses — where risk is hidden, leverage is opaque, and failures come as complete shocks. When those systems break, they don’t recover quickly. They collapse entirely. DeFi works differently. Risks are visible on-chain Responses are transparent and immediate Recovery is collaborative, not controlled by a single entity That doesn’t mean DeFi is perfect. Far from it. But it does mean one thing: 👉 DeFi learns in public — and improves because of it. 🎯 For Traders & Investors — The Real Lessons If you’re just chasing yields or short-term gains, this event probably felt like chaos. But if you’re thinking long-term, it offered clarity. Pay attention to where your collateral comes from Understand the infrastructure behind the assets you use Don’t underestimate bridge-related risks Always consider how fast liquidations can cascade And most importantly: 👉 Opportunities don’t come from avoiding volatility — they come from understanding it. 🚀 What Happens Next — The Road Forward The recovery process is already underway, but this isn’t just about fixing rsETH. It’s about raising the standard for the entire ecosystem. We’ll likely see: Stronger bridge validation mechanisms Better risk frameworks for collateral assets More conservative LTV ratios for synthetic tokens Increased institutional scrutiny before capital deployment In other words, the bar is being raised — and that’s a good thing. Because long-term growth doesn’t come from avoiding crises. It comes from surviving them and improving afterward. 💬 Final Thought The Moment That Defined DeFi’s Direction This wasn’t just an exploit. It wasn’t just a market event. It wasn’t even just about rsETH. It was a demonstration. A real-world example of how decentralized systems behave under pressure. And the result? DeFi didn’t panic. DeFi didn’t freeze. DeFi didn’t collapse. 👉 DeFi coordinated. DeFi adapted. DeFi endured. That’s not the sign of a fragile system. That’s the sign of something still early but already proving its strength. And if this is how DeFi handles stress today… Just imagine what it will look like tomorrow.
2
0
1
0