Polymarket adjusts trading mechanism, 15-minute crypto market opening and closing order fee

ChainNewsAbmedia

Prediction Market Platform Polymarket recently updated its official trading documentation, showing that its “15-minute cryptocurrency price movement market” has officially started charging trading fees to the taker side, indicating a change in Polymarket’s long-standing zero-fee mechanism. However, this applies only to specific short-term crypto markets, while most other markets still maintain a no-fee structure.

Polymarket quietly updates, charging first in the 15-minute crypto markets

According to the latest Polymarket documentation, the platform has officially begun charging trading fees on the “15-minute cryptocurrency up/down markets,” and only to the taker side. The document states that this system is not universally applied but limited to high-frequency, very short-cycle crypto markets. Most other markets continue to operate with no transaction fees.

Clear purpose for fees, all taker fees are redistributed to liquidity providers

The official explanation states that the trading fees collected from the taker side are not retained by the platform for revenue but are distributed daily in USDC to liquidity providers in the market, i.e., the order-placing side (Maker).

Polymarket emphasizes that the core purpose of this mechanism is to establish a stable liquidity subsidy source to support market pricing and depth, rather than to generate platform-level commissions or taxes.

Variable rates based on probability, highest costs in the 50-50 range

Regarding the fee structure, the official documentation indicates that trading fees will dynamically adjust based on market probability. When the market probability approaches 50%, the fee rate reaches its highest; as the probability moves toward 0% or 100%, the fee rate quickly decreases, approaching zero.

Using the example provided in the document, if a trader buys 100 contracts at $0.50 each, they would pay approximately $1.56 in trading fees, which is a little over 3% of the transaction value, representing the peak of the overall fee curve.

The diagram shows the official fee mechanism explained in the documentation. Community reactions focus on the structure, interpreting it as an adjustment to the market mechanism.

Although Polymarket has not issued an official announcement, this change quickly sparked discussion on community platforms. Some market participants pointed out that this adjustment seems more like a correction to the market structure rather than a simple fee increase.

Others believe that returning fees to the order-placing side via taker fees helps reduce wash trading and weakens the incentive for high-frequency trading bots to repeatedly place orders in a zero-fee environment.

Limited actual impact, short-term markets test first

In terms of scope, this adjustment applies only to the 15-minute crypto price movement markets and does not cover political predictions, long-term event contracts, or other non-crypto markets. Most users’ frequently traded markets still remain fee-free.

Additionally, even in markets where fees are charged, small transactions are rounded, so the actual fees are relatively limited; when trades are clearly one-sided bets with probabilities near extremes, the fee rate also drops significantly. Whether this mechanism will be expanded further has not been clarified by the official sources.

(Understanding Polymarket: What is a Mirror Order Book? Why must YES + NO equal 1?)

This article about Polymarket adjusting its trading mechanism, with the 15-minute crypto market fee introduction, first appeared on Chain News ABMedia.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

deBridge cross-chain service on Zilliqa will end on March 31, and users need to complete USDC migration.

Zilliqa announces that its deBridge cross-chain bridge service within its ecosystem will terminate on March 31, 2026. Users must complete USDC cross-chain transfers before this date. This infrastructure upgrade is to improve stability and migrate USDC liquidity to the self-developed XBridge and zUSDC.

GateNews1h ago

Is Circle's stock price undervalued after a 22% plunge? Bitwise is optimistic about USDC, with a valuation potentially reaching $75 billion by 2030.

In March 2026, Circle's stock price experienced a significant pullback due to expectations surrounding the CLARITY Act, but Bitwise's Chief Investment Officer believes the market has misjudged. The core driving force behind stablecoins is payment efficiency. Bitwise predicts that by 2030, Circle's valuation could reach $75 billion. Despite increased short-term uncertainty, projects with strong compliance capabilities will benefit in the long run.

GateNews3h ago

USDC daily trading volume reaches $39.05 million, hitting a 52-week high

Gate News reports that on March 26, according to official data, the daily trading volume of USDC reached $39.05 million, a 52-week high.

GateNews3h ago

Fenbushi Co-Founder Offers Bounty to Recover $42M Crypto Hack

Fenbushi Capital co-founder Bo Shen has initiated a bounty program to recover $42 million stolen in a 2022 hack, offering 10-20% rewards for contributions to recovery. Recent advances in blockchain analysis have improved investigative capabilities, with some funds already frozen.

GateNews3h ago

# Major CEX Again Rejects Latest Draft of Clarity Act, Disagreement Remains Focused on Stablecoin Yield Provisions

A certain CEX has again stated to the U.S. Senate that it cannot support the latest draft of the Clarity Act due to core disagreements over stablecoin yield provisions. The CEX expressed "serious concerns" about the new proposal, noting that this regulatory direction would have significant financial implications for its future.

GateNews8h ago

Circle Unfreezes Wallets Associated with Single Civil Lawsuit, Following Criticism Over Unprofessional Batch Freezing

On-chain detective ZachXBT pointed out that Circle unfroze a balance of 130,966 USDC in a wallet associated with Goated. Previously, Circle had frozen 16 hot wallets in response to U.S. civil litigation, a freezing decision that lacked basis and impacted the company's daily operations.

BlockBeatNews8h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments