**XBwQGH**

Now I just need to treat the people on BSC as less than human, and I feel much better.

Got it, that's great

I heard you're building.

Cursing while earning, driving them crazy. I'm damn comfortable.

The reason for the debate is to encourage everyone to oppose this behavior. The fundamental principle remains the same. In the long run, retail investors won't have many opportunities to make money. If you only focus on the small gains in your own holdings, like a few fruits and dates, and get excited when they suddenly comment on your token and you make a few bucks, you'll be easily manipulated. You'll keep earning small amounts and losing big amounts.

Most newly deployed tokens on each chain reflect the current ecosystem of the chain and the impression left by the founders.

Additionally, I will no longer comment on these things on BSC. You can never wake up someone who is pretending to sleep. Moreover, you have to admit that the overall cultural level of Twitter is actually quite low, and they only care about利益. When I initially lost 90% of my principal a few times, I never flattered anyone or accepted advertisements or promoted any projects I thought were bad to make a profit, because "a gentleman loves wealth and acquires it through proper means."

So if someone finds that everyone in the room is spitting into the same toilet, they can't say that if this continues, everyone will have to drink contaminated water, because that would be disrespecting others' freedom to spit? The true core of decentralization is that resources and decision-making are not monopolized by a single entity. On BSC, it has already been monopolized. In a truly decentralized world, people should be allowed, even encouraged, to point out where re-centralization is occurring.

I think the most worth reading and the most insightful part has already been on the cover: bsc: dirt. I saw Yijie’s comment and quickly browsed through it, and here is a brief summary of my views. He believes that not understanding is a driving force for a rise, but this is survivor bias. Projects that face more controversy tend to die quickly (whether they are VC projects or meme projects). Controversy is the spark, not the fuel; it cannot become a sustainable engine or a driving force for growth.

Do you see clearly now? It's just to make you lick; if you don't, it's not acceptable. Coming to Web3 is supposed to be about earning money while standing, but instead, here we are being manipulated.

Unintentionally planting willows, and they grow into shade. Wishing everyone immediate success!

I now have a bit of understanding of this tweet.

Additionally, don't attribute the trend to poor market conditions. When the market was bad before, meme was still doing well. It's just that that thing wouldn't buy again at this time.

Success is achieved instantly and I have arrived; I bought because I initially thought this idiom had a very good meaning and everyone has been using it. I have arrived, and my initial purchase was not because of sucking up + licking, but because I thought this meme was funny at the time. At that time, this meme didn't involve any double saint, and as a result...

I just smiled briefly, not truly happy at all. When the heavens see it, they start to punish me inexplicably. I'm just forcing a smile... Putting on a face, as if the heavens think I am rebellious...

Still stubborn, then there's really no hope.

Currently, what are the issues? It's not better than before, and everyone is still playing Chinese narratives, still able to choose for themselves, giving some time for development. Honestly, who can be the leader? Now launching life spot trading, isn't it just forcing all Chinese memes to be tied to it to create a funny life? Dressing it up? Yesterday, when discussing this, some people stubbornly argued that it's a positive development. Where is the positive? Besides the holders.