The discourse still paints “AI agents” as an automation narrative.

The real unlock is simpler: coordination without custody.

@Infinit_Labs non-custodial Agent Swarm means the agents never hold size.
They read state, compute routes, and push instructions, but capital stays anchored to the user’s smart-account.
No pooled funds. No shared vault exposure. No rehypothecation risk hidden under an “AI layer.”

From a market-structure POV, that changes everything.

🔸 operations become atomic instead of sequentially exposed
🔸 routes update without waiting for signatures
🔸 execution is deterministic instead of latency-fragile
🔸 strategies don’t fail because one leg drifts before the next

It also removes the weakest link:
“AI automation” that requires custody is just a fancy multisig.
One breach, one exploit, one mispriced vault, and everything evaporates.

@Infinit_Labs avoids that class of risk entirely.

Agents operate as independent modules: hedging, rebalancing, bridge selection, liquidity scanning, rate optimization.
Each runs compute, outputs one deterministic instruction set, and the user’s account executes only what validates cryptographically.

Horizontal scaling becomes trivial:
add new agents, add new strategies, keep the same trust boundary.

This isn’t about smarter bots.
It’s about execution that doesn’t inherit new attack surfaces.