War On Iran, Pakistanafghanistan Cooperation Is More Urgent Than Ever

(MENAFN- Tribal News Network)

–>

Rising tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan come at a particularly fragile moment for the broader region. While the two neighbors remain preoccupied with border disputes and crosans-border militancy, the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East is undergoing rapid transformation driven by the escalating confrontation involving Iran, the United States, and Israel.

These developments may appear geographically distant, but their strategic implications for South and Central Asia could be significant.

If Iran were to suffer a major strategic setback in its confrontation with Israel and the United States, the resulting political shifts could fundamentally alter the regional balance of power.

A weakened Iran-or a government more closely aligned with Western interests-would reshape security dynamics across the wider region.

For Pakistan and Afghanistan, such a shift could introduce new geopolitical pressures. Both countries have historically refused to recognize Israel, largely due to their support for the Palestinian cause and opposition to Israeli control over Palestinian territories and East Jerusalem, home to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Islam’s third holiest site.

Also Read: Pakistan, Afghanistan Edge Toward Prolonged Border Confrontation

Over the past decade, Israel has demonstrated an increasing ability to shape regional security through advanced intelligence capabilities, technological superiority, and pre-emptive operations beyond its borders.

Backed by strong political and military support from the United States, Israel has significantly altered the strategic environment of the Middle East.

Operations targeting senior Iranian military and political leaders, including Ali Hosseini Khamenei, and efforts to weaken Iran-aligned groups such as Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon demonstrate how modern intelligence networks, advanced surveillance systems, and precision weaponry can disrupt both state and non-state actors.

Continued political and military support from the United States has further emboldened Israel to pursue its strategic objectives in the region, with critics arguing that these policies also reflect broader ambitions tied to the long-standing idea of a“Greater Israel.”

A significant reduction in Iran’s regional influence would remove one of Israel’s principal strategic constraints and potentially give it greater freedom to shape emerging security arrangements in the region.

Such a transformation would not remain confined to the Middle East. It could indirectly affect political and security calculations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Afghanistan, currently governed by the Taliban following the withdrawal of NATO and United States forces, already faces significant international isolation and limited diplomatic recognition.

In a shifting regional environment, pressure on Kabul could intensify, particularly regarding its commitments under the Doha Agreement to prevent militant groups from operating from Afghan territory.

With a more cooperative government potentially emerging in Iran, some analysts fear that the United States and Israel could increase pressure on Afghanistan-possibly even advocating regime change under the pretext of counterterrorism and regional stability. At the same time, deteriorating relations between Kabul and Islamabad may further complicate the situation.

Unlike during the two decades of guerrilla war against U.S. and NATO forces, the Taliban may no longer find the same degree of refuge or strategic depth across the Pakistani border, making their regional position more uncertain.

While the Taliban proved effective in guerrilla warfare during the two decades of insurgency against Western forces, governing a state while confronting technologically advanced adversaries poses a different challenge.

Modern conflict increasingly relies on precision intelligence, cyber capabilities, drones, and targeted operations capable of disrupting leadership structures and logistical networks.

Meanwhile, tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan continue to deepen. Islamabad has repeatedly accused the Taliban government of allowing groups such as Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Baloch insurgent networks to operate from Afghan territory and conduct attacks inside Pakistan.

These accusations have intensified mistrust between the two countries at a moment when strategic coordination would be far more beneficial.

Pakistan could also face growing scrutiny in a changing geopolitical environment. Since Israel’s establishment in 1948, Pakistan and Israel have maintained no diplomatic relations and a history of mutual distrust.

Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program and expanding missile capabilities are frequently viewed by Israeli strategists as potential long-term security concerns.

If Israel’s regional influence expands further, it could work closely with partners such as the United States and India to raise international attention on Pakistan’s strategic capabilities.

International pressure of this kind has previously been applied to Iran through sanctions and diplomatic isolation. Moreover, the adversaries of Pakistan can openly support Baloch insurgents to use the soil of Iran against Pakistan.

Such developments would place Pakistan under pressure on multiple fronts-from strategic competition with India to instability along its western border with Afghanistan and a new challenging reality in the south.

Afghanistan, meanwhile, remains economically fragile and diplomatically isolated.

From a policy perspective, continued confrontation between the two neighbors is strategically counterproductive.

Persistent border tensions weaken both states and create opportunities for external actors to exploit divisions in pursuit of their own regional agendas.

A more pragmatic policy approach would prioritize three key areas of cooperation.

First, Pakistan and Afghanistan must establish more credible mechanisms to address cross-border militancy.

The presence of armed groups such as the TTP remains the most immediate source of tension between the two countries. Without progress on this issue, trust will remain fragile and security competition will intensify.

Second, both governments should strengthen diplomatic engagement and institutional dialogue to prevent border incidents from escalating into broader confrontations.

Structured security cooperation-however limited-would reduce miscalculations and help stabilize the frontier.

Third, regional diplomacy should focus on reducing Afghanistan’s isolation while encouraging responsible governance and counter-terrorism commitments from Kabul. A more stable Afghanistan ultimately benefits Pakistan as well.

The broader lesson is clear. As global geopolitical competition intensifies, regional alignments are likely to shift in ways that smaller or economically fragile states may find difficult to influence.

For Pakistan and Afghanistan, strategic rivalry at such a moment risks compounding their vulnerabilities. Greater cooperation, conflict management, and diplomatic engagement would not resolve all disputes, but they would strengthen both countries’ ability to navigate an increasingly uncertain geopolitical environment.

In an era of rapid geopolitical change, strategic foresight-not reactive confrontation-will determine which states are able to safeguard their sovereignty and long-term stability.

MENAFN05032026000189011041ID1110823138