12 月 ETH 价格预测 · 发帖挑战 📈
12 月降息预期升温,ETH 热点回暖,借此窗口期发起行情预测互动!
欢迎 Gate 社区用户 —— 判趋势 · 猜行情 · 赢奖励 💰
奖励 🎁:预测命中的用户中抽取 5 位,每位 10 USDT
时间 📅:预测截止 12 月 11 日 12:00(UTC+8)
参与方式 ✍️:
在 Gate 广场发布 ETH 行情预测帖,写明价格区间(如 $3,200–$3,400,区间需<$200),并添加话题 #ETH12月行情预测
发帖示例 👇
示例①:
#ETH12月行情预测
预测区间:$3,150-$3,250
行情偏震荡上行,若降息如期落地 + ETF 情绪配合,冲击前高可期 🚀
示例②:
#ETH12月行情预测
预测区间:$3,300-$3,480
资金回流 + L2 降费利好中期趋势,向上试探 $3,400 的概率更高 📊
评选规则 📍
以 12 月 11 日 12:00(UTC+8)ETH 实时价格为参考
价格落入预测区间 → 视为命中
若命中人数>5 → 从命中者中随机抽取 5 位 🏆
Ripple vs. SEC: Legal Drama Escalates – A Turning Point for Cryptocurrency? XRP Price Set for Major Breakout to $1
In a continued legal tussle that could potentially reshape the cryptocurrency landscape, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has intensified its efforts to seek a mid-case appeal in the ongoing Ripple vs. XRP battle. This move follows a recent ruling by Judge Analisa Torres, which found Ripple guilty of violating federal securities laws in its dealings with institutional investors while sparing retail investors.
Ripple’s Argument Against Appeal
Ripple, the blockchain-based company closely associated with the XRP cryptocurrency, had initially contested the SEC’s appeal request, asserting that it lacked sufficient merit. However, the SEC has responded assertively, emphasizing the industry-wide significance of the legal issues at hand.
The heart of the matter revolves around whether Ripple’s actions in offering XRP to retail investors on cryptocurrency exchanges amounted to a violation of securities law. The SEC contends that this question warrants the intervention of an appeals court, while Ripple has attempted to challenge the need for an appeal.
Judge Jed Rakoff, presiding over a separate case brought by the SEC, previously disagreed with Judge Torres’ ruling, underscoring the complexity and divergence of legal interpretations surrounding XRP. The SEC has cited Judge Rakoff’s differing judgment as part of its argument for an interlocutory appeal, allowing an appellate court to address certain legal questions while the case progresses in the original court.
The SEC’s filing states, “[Judge Rakoff] did reject this Court’s legal conclusion that the existence of ‘blind’ trading platform-based transactions precludes the application of Howey, as a matter of law, under virtually identical facts (sales of the crypto asset by the issuer to investors on a platform in blind bid/ask transactions).”
Should Judge Torres grant the SEC’s motion for a mid-case appeal, the case will enter the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, further complicating the already intricate legal battle. This development raises broader questions about regulatory clarity and the classification of digital assets in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency space.
As this legal saga unfolds, it remains a focal point in the ongoing conversation about crypto regulations, leaving the crypto industry and investors eagerly awaiting further developments in the Ripple vs. SEC dispute.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: