👀 家人们,每天看行情、刷大佬观点,却从来不开口说两句?你的观点可能比你想的更有价值!
广场新人 & 回归福利正式上线!不管你是第一次发帖还是久违回归,我们都直接送你奖励!🎁
每月 $20,000 奖金等你来领!
📅 活动时间: 长期有效(月底结算)
💎 参与方式:
用户需为首次发帖的新用户或一个月未发帖的回归用户。
发帖时必须带上话题标签: #我在广场发首帖 。
内容不限:币圈新闻、行情分析、晒单吐槽、币种推荐皆可。
💰 奖励机制:
必得奖:发帖体验券
每位有效发帖用户都可获得 $50 仓位体验券。(注:每月奖池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太热情,我们会继续加码!)
进阶奖:发帖双王争霸
月度发帖王: 当月发帖数量最多的用户,额外奖励 50U。
月度互动王: 当月帖子互动量(点赞+评论+转发+分享)最高的用户,额外奖励 50U。
📝 发帖要求:
帖子字数需 大于30字,拒绝纯表情或无意义字符。
内容需积极健康,符合社区规范,严禁广告引流及违规内容。
💡 你的观点可能会启发无数人,你的第一次分享也许就是成为“广场大V”的起点,现在就开始广场创作之旅吧!
Custodia Bank vs. Feds: Legal Brawl as Important as Ripple_s XRP Case: Lawyer
Wyoming-based Custodia Bank’s application to become a member of the Federal Reserve was rejected earlier this year by the Kansas City Fed. But the platform has no intention of backing down.
The legal dispute took a new turn after Custodia slapped three lawsuits against the regulator in three separate circuits. According to attorney John Deaton, Custodia’s fight against the Feds is “arguably just as important (if not more)” as the Ripple-XRP case.
Custodia vs. Feds
Custodia was founded by Morgan Stanley veteran Caitlin Long in 2020. The platform offers a bridge between digital assets and the US dollar . In its lawsuit, Custodia accused the Federal Reserve of unlawfully delaying its application for a so-called master account, which happens to be an important component necessary to effectively participate in the US financial eco.
After moving to court, Custodia notched a key win as Wyoming Federal Judge denied the Federal Reserve’s bid to dismiss its lawsuit against it. As for the Fed, its official reason for denial was concerns over Custodia’s short history and what the institution considers to be a problematic business model – that involves primarily fees, such as for storing crypto tokens, instead of investments, by lending out customer deposits.
The Fed even released an 86-page order explaining its decision in March. Its argument centers around Custodia Bank’s business model being “too risky,” indicating the platform lacks FDIC deposit insurance, which is used to make deposit holders whole in the event of a bank failure.
In short, the Fed disapproves of Custodia accepting crypto assets as deposits due to the “speculative and volatile nature of the crypto-asset eco.”
Case of Power Grab
Custodia maintained that the dispute is a clear case of a power grab by the Fed and is looking forward to the court’s review.
In a new tweet, Deaton also echoed a similar sentiment when he said that the Custodia vs. Fed case is as important as the Ripple vs. SEC battle, in which the blockchain firm scored a partial victory. The attorney believes the Custodia lawsuit serves as a clear example that major regulators have been neglecting their statutory obligations.
Deaton further added that the court cases are threatening to end the Federal Reserve’s “arbitrary and capricious conduct.”