👀 家人们,每天看行情、刷大佬观点,却从来不开口说两句?你的观点可能比你想的更有价值!
广场新人 & 回归福利正式上线!不管你是第一次发帖还是久违回归,我们都直接送你奖励!🎁
每月 $20,000 奖金等你来领!
📅 活动时间: 长期有效(月底结算)
💎 参与方式:
用户需为首次发帖的新用户或一个月未发帖的回归用户。
发帖时必须带上话题标签: #我在广场发首帖 。
内容不限:币圈新闻、行情分析、晒单吐槽、币种推荐皆可。
💰 奖励机制:
必得奖:发帖体验券
每位有效发帖用户都可获得 $50 仓位体验券。(注:每月奖池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太热情,我们会继续加码!)
进阶奖:发帖双王争霸
月度发帖王: 当月发帖数量最多的用户,额外奖励 50U。
月度互动王: 当月帖子互动量(点赞+评论+转发+分享)最高的用户,额外奖励 50U。
📝 发帖要求:
帖子字数需 大于30字,拒绝纯表情或无意义字符。
内容需积极健康,符合社区规范,严禁广告引流及违规内容。
💡 你的观点可能会启发无数人,你的第一次分享也许就是成为“广场大V”的起点,现在就开始广场创作之旅吧!
UK Judge Rules Craig Wright Must Pay $516K to Proceed with Lawsuit Against Coinbase, Kraken
Craig Wright is not someone to stay out of the spotlight for a long time. In the latest development, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator was ordered to pay approximately $516,000 (400,000 British pounds) in security covering legal costs to pursue claims against crypto exchanges Coinbase and Kraken.
The lawsuit against Coinbase and Kraken’s parent company Payward was brought by Wright last May for several hundred billion pounds in damages, claiming that only he has the right to use the Bitcoin brand.
UK Order
In a judgment issued on Tuesday, James Mellor, a judge presiding over the England and Wales High Court, expressed skepticism about Wright’s ability to cover his legal expenses. This doubt arose from statements provided by the Australian scientist regarding his financial status to the US court proceedings involving former business partner Ira Kleiman.
Mellor revisited Wright’s previous assertions of being financially “untouchable.” Despite the evidence presented, the judge remains unconvinced of Wright’s capacity to afford the legal costs. The judge added that the evidence presented an “obscure picture” about which individuals or entities owned which Bitcoin assets Wright had easy access.
In addition to ordering Wright’s company to compensate for the security deposits, Mellor also said the infringement lawsuits against the two crypto giants should stay pending for the time being.
According to the judge, the fate of the case will hinge on the verdict of – Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright – which is expected to determine whether or not Wright is truly Satoshi Nakamoto. If Wright fails to prove himself true in the identity case, it’s highly unlikely that the trademark case would stand a chance.
Wright’s Legal Affairs
Earning the position as a controversial figure in the crypto industry, Wright has launched several lawsuits against those who called him a liar opposing claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wright slapped a similar lawsuit against a Bitcoin proponent pseudonymously known as Hodlonaut for calling him a “fraud” and “scammer” on social media. Hodlonaut, however, won the lawsuit last October. The Norwegian court ruled that Hodlonaut had “sufficient factual grounds to claim that Wright had lied and cheated in his attempt to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto.”