👀 家人们,每天看行情、刷大佬观点,却从来不开口说两句?你的观点可能比你想的更有价值!
广场新人 & 回归福利正式上线!不管你是第一次发帖还是久违回归,我们都直接送你奖励!🎁
每月 $20,000 奖金等你来领!
📅 活动时间: 长期有效(月底结算)
💎 参与方式:
用户需为首次发帖的新用户或一个月未发帖的回归用户。
发帖时必须带上话题标签: #我在广场发首帖 。
内容不限:币圈新闻、行情分析、晒单吐槽、币种推荐皆可。
💰 奖励机制:
必得奖:发帖体验券
每位有效发帖用户都可获得 $50 仓位体验券。(注:每月奖池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太热情,我们会继续加码!)
进阶奖:发帖双王争霸
月度发帖王: 当月发帖数量最多的用户,额外奖励 50U。
月度互动王: 当月帖子互动量(点赞+评论+转发+分享)最高的用户,额外奖励 50U。
📝 发帖要求:
帖子字数需 大于30字,拒绝纯表情或无意义字符。
内容需积极健康,符合社区规范,严禁广告引流及违规内容。
💡 你的观点可能会启发无数人,你的第一次分享也许就是成为“广场大V”的起点,现在就开始广场创作之旅吧!
Blockchain Association: After SEC Chair Gary Gensler Sued Ripple (XRP), Binance, and Coinbase, Chair Has to Step Back
The entire digital asset industry feels under intentional attack from the Chairman of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Gary Gensler. Therefore, crypto lawyers and other industry advocates have been mounting pressure on him to recuse himself as an arbiter and judge over digital asset enforcement actions.
Specifically, Jake Chervinsky, a lawyer and Chief Policy Officer at the Blockchain Association clearly stated in an open letter that Gensler has “wrongly prejudged that all digital assets are securities.”
Based on this stance, he noted that Federal law requires that Gensler recuse himself from all enforcement decisions related to digital assets. Also, the lawyer clarified that all enforcement actions meted out by the SEC must be done following the “Wells Process.”
Barr & Young Attorneys described a Well Process as a prelude to a potential lawsuit. SEC commissioners are expected to act as neutral arbiters during this process. Their main responsibility is to weigh the evidence and arguments presented by SEC staff and the target of the enforcement without bias. Based on Chervinsky’s judgement, Gensler is nothing close to being a neutral arbiter when it concerns digital assets.
Instead, all he has done since his appointment as the SEC Chair has been to categorize all cryptocurrencies except Bitcoin (BTC) as securities. While Gensler has constantly maintained his stance on the classification of crypto as securities, Congress has not issued any official statement or regulation confirming this argument. This suggests that the entire securities talk might just be a ploy by the SEC Chair against the nascent industry.
Gensler has repeatedly pointed out that the series of enforcement actions levied on crypto entities were meant to protect investors. However, crypto investors argue that he is protecting someone but that person is not the investors who have recorded a series of losses resulting from SEC lawsuits.
Gensler May Be Working For The interest of TradFi
Some observers are saying that Gensler is intentionally cracking down on crypto firms to pave the way for traditional financial (TradFi) institutions like JPMorgan and BlackRock.
Leading digital assets service providers Binance and Coinbase were recently issued two separate lawsuits by the regulator for listing unregistered securities amongst other charges.
Tokens like BNB (BNB), Binance USD stablecoin (BUSD), Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Polygon (MATIC), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos Hub (ATOM), The Sandbox (SAND), Decentraland (MANA), Algorand (ALGO), Axie Infinity (AXS,) and Coti (COTI) were regarded as securities. The enforcement action caused the price of many of these coins to lose value and in turn, caused investors to forfeit several millions.
It was barely a week after these filings that investment asset management firm BlackRock filed for a spot BTC Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). More asset managers like Invesco, WisdomTree, Valkyrie and Bitwise also applied for the same offering. No approval has been issued by the SEC to any of these firms to list a spot BTC ETF, however, it seems like institutional investors have suddenly become interested in the crypto space.