👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
SEC Drops Charges: Ripple_s Garlinghouse and Larsen Vindicated in Landmark Case
In a landmark decision, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has cleared Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, and utive Chairman, Chris Larsen, of all ‘baseless’ allegations in a long-standing securities violation case. This development marks a significant victory for Ripple after enduring nearly three years of intense regulatory scrutiny.
The SEC’s decision to dismiss charges signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing dispute between the cryptocurrency industry and the regulatory authority. This legal battle has been closely watched as it sets a precedent in defining what constitutes security in digital assets.
Ripple Triumphs in SEC Legal Battle
The allegations against Garlinghouse and Larsen, initially filed in December 2020, asserted that the digital asset XRP distributions should have been registered as a security. The court’s ruling in July 2023 declared that XRP itself is not a security, a verdict that gave Ripple a significant victory.
The SEC and Ripple have expressed their intention to meet and discuss a potential briefing schedule regarding the pending issue in the case, specifically concerning the appropriate remedies for Ripple’s Section 5 violations related to its Institutional Sales of XRP. Ripple responded to the filing, describing the original pursuit by the SEC as “absurd theatrics” and characterizing this development as a “surrender.”
Brad Garlinghouse has expressed relief after nearly three years of battling baseless allegations. He criticized the SEC for seemingly diverting its attention from criminal activities on offshore exchanges to target individuals and a company working towards building a regulated business within the United States.
Simultaneously, utive Chairman Chris Larsen expressed his sense of vindication, emphasizing the personal toll this lawsuit took on both individuals. He raised pertinent questions about the origin and motivation behind the SEC’s legal pursuit, highlighting what he perceived as an abuse of power.
Ripple’s Impact on the Crypto Industry
Despite this victory, Ripple’s pursuit of sound crypto regulation within the United States is far from over. The company continues to actively dialogue with policymakers and regulators worldwide, aiming to foster responsible innovation within the digital assets industry.
This legal development has implications not only for Ripple but for the broader cryptocurrency industry as well. Under Chair Gary Gensler’s leadership, the SEC has been striving to establish a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. However, this case demonstrates the complexity and challenges in classifying ious digital assets as securities, a matter that is far from settled.
Meanwhile, Katherine Kirkpatrick, the chief legal officer for Cboe Digital, has speculated in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that the SEC may have dismissed the cases against the individual defendants as a legal tactic. She suggested that this move allows them to appeal the Ripple decision much sooner, as opposed to waiting until the conclusion of the trial, which would have been in late spring.