👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Ethereum’s Potential ‘Supreme Court’ Could Secure the Network’s Future
The Ethereum blockchain network has always been a go-to platform for new players to launch their projects and enter the crypto space. In an exciting proposal, Matter Labs co-founder and CEO Alex Gluchowski talks about having an Ethereum court , which will have a similar hierarchical court as in the real world.
In a Twitter post last Saturday, September 2, floated this idea of having an “Ethereum Supreme Court”. He added that this would be similar to the United States Supreme Court, and would be the final stop for parties to dispute the smart contracts issue. Alex Gluchowski stated that this would serve as an intermediary instead of always taking matters to the traditional court or lawyer. Gluchowski stated;
In Gluchowski’s vision, conflicts and urgent updates would be managed through a tiered structure of on-chain courts. The ultimate authority, however, would be an Ethereum layer-1 soft fork, functioning as the “Court of Final Appeal.”
Under this framework, each protocol would maintain its own governance with established procedures for regular and emergency upgrades. Additionally, they would designate a specific contract capable of initiating an appeal process.
Decentralizing Smart Contracts Issue Resolution
Gluchowski also explains how the would work in the case of urgency. In the event of an emergency protocol upgrade, a designated appeal window would be instituted, allowing any user to raise objections to a higher court. However, individuals wishing to contest the upgrade would be required to provide a predetermined bail deposit.
In a hypothetical court hierarchy, protocols such as Aave and Uniswap would engage in disputes through courts like CourtUnchained or JusticeDAO. Following the rulings of these courts, parties would retain the right to escalate their case to the Ethereum Supreme Court.
Nonetheless, Gluchowski acknowledged that for the on-chain court to function effectively, it would necessitate robust social consensus. However, this could be expensive, and thus only “truly extraordinary” cases will be brought before it.
Gluchowski pointed out that while there are already some solutions to address these disputes, they are not entirely effective. For instance, implementing time-locked features in smart contracts may not be suitable for emergency situations. On the other hand, introducing a security council can help mitigate the problem but may not offer a complete solution and comes with its own set of risks.
“A security council could only freeze the contract temporarily, requiring a token governance approval for an emergency upgrade. But now a malicious majority of undercollaterized stakers could perform an evil take-over upgrade and steal all the assets,” he explained.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: