👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
UK Judge Rules Craig Wright Must Pay $516K to Proceed with Lawsuit Against Coinbase, Kraken
Craig Wright is not someone to stay out of the spotlight for a long time. In the latest development, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator was ordered to pay approximately $516,000 (400,000 British pounds) in security covering legal costs to pursue claims against crypto exchanges Coinbase and Kraken.
The lawsuit against Coinbase and Kraken’s parent company Payward was brought by Wright last May for several hundred billion pounds in damages, claiming that only he has the right to use the Bitcoin brand.
UK Order
In a judgment issued on Tuesday, James Mellor, a judge presiding over the England and Wales High Court, expressed skepticism about Wright’s ability to cover his legal expenses. This doubt arose from statements provided by the Australian scientist regarding his financial status to the US court proceedings involving former business partner Ira Kleiman.
Mellor revisited Wright’s previous assertions of being financially “untouchable.” Despite the evidence presented, the judge remains unconvinced of Wright’s capacity to afford the legal costs. The judge added that the evidence presented an “obscure picture” about which individuals or entities owned which Bitcoin assets Wright had easy access.
In addition to ordering Wright’s company to compensate for the security deposits, Mellor also said the infringement lawsuits against the two crypto giants should stay pending for the time being.
According to the judge, the fate of the case will hinge on the verdict of – Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright – which is expected to determine whether or not Wright is truly Satoshi Nakamoto. If Wright fails to prove himself true in the identity case, it’s highly unlikely that the trademark case would stand a chance.
Wright’s Legal Affairs
Earning the position as a controversial figure in the crypto industry, Wright has launched several lawsuits against those who called him a liar opposing claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wright slapped a similar lawsuit against a Bitcoin proponent pseudonymously known as Hodlonaut for calling him a “fraud” and “scammer” on social media. Hodlonaut, however, won the lawsuit last October. The Norwegian court ruled that Hodlonaut had “sufficient factual grounds to claim that Wright had lied and cheated in his attempt to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto.”