👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Lawyer: SEC vs. Ripple Victory Will Be ‘Law of the Land’ and Secure Bitcoin Bull Market for the Next 3 Years
In a recent interview with Real Vision’s Crypto Editor Ash Bennington, attorney John Deaton emphasized the significance of the SEC vs. Ripple ruling and its impact on the cryptocurrency industry. According to Deaton, this ruling will serve as the law of the land for the next two to three years. His comments were shared by Fox Business’ Eleanor Terrett on Twitter.
Eleanor Terrett tweeted: ”
Marc Fagel responded to the tweet, stating:
Judge Torres’ Decision and Its Implications
On July 13, Judge Torres delivered her highly anticipated ruling on the SEC vs. Ripple case. While neither party achieved a complete victory through summary judgment, the judge sided against the SEC’s claim that Ripple had violated the law with its programmatic XRP sales. However, she ruled that Ripple’s direct sales to institutional clients qualified as securities, while determining that XRP itself is not a security.
Expectations of Appeals and Disappointing Reactions
Legal experts have speculated that one of the parties involved in the case will likely appeal the ruling. SEC Chair Gary Gensler expressed disappointment with the court’s decision and mentioned that the regulator is currently uating its options. Deaton, on the other hand, believes that Judge Torres will reject the SEC’s appeal request, denying them the opportunity to challenge her decision.
Conflicting Opinions: Deaton vs. Fagel
Deaton’s viewpoint aligns with Eleanor Terrett’s tweet, stating that the judge’s decision will stand as the law of the land for the next 2-3 years, given the absence of an interlocutory appeal. He further emphasized that it will take time before the case reaches the second circuit.
However, Marc Fagel provides a contrasting perspective, noting that the ruling is specific to the Southern District of New York (SDNY) court and is not legally binding on other courts. Nevertheless, Fagel acknowledges its influence due to being the only judicial decision on crypto trading through exchanges.
Clarity from Attorney Deaton
Attorney John Deaton, in response to Fagel’s remarks, maintains his stance regarding the impact of Judge Torres’ ruling. He reiterates that the ruling will indeed be the “law of the land” concerning the SEC vs. Ripple case and highlights the potential duration of up to three years before the judge approves the SEC’s appeal request. Deaton also speculates that the SEC may reference their successful outcome in the LBRY ruling to contest Judge Torres’ decision.
With the SDNY court holding significant influence, Deaton believes that the SEC is unlikely to publicly admit its importance. Therefore, he maintains that the SEC vs. Ripple ruling will shape the industry landscape for the next two to three years.