👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Swiss National Bank explores if Bitcoin could Oust Fiat currencies and become global currency
The Cryptoassets and Financial Innovation conference, hosted recently by the Swiss National Bank, became a platform for a riveting discourse about the potential upheaval of fiat money. Economist Lawrence H. White, a distinguished Senior Fellow at George Mason University and senior scholar at the Cato Institute, steered the conversation. White hypothesized about the feasibility of traditional currency being dethroned by options like gold, BTC, or possibly an inflation-linked token.
In his presentation, White shared intriguing anecdotes about crossing paths with Hal Finney and Nick Szabo, individuals speculated to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin. Central to his talk was the issue of a lack of competition among central banks.
Recalling the rampant inflation of the 70s, White revisited proposals from that time aimed at limiting the discretion of central bank policymakers. Renowned economist Hayek had suggested increased competition, first via access to foreign fiat currencies, and later through the introduction of private currencies aimed at preserving purchasing power.
In today’s financial landscape, potential challengers to the dominance of fiat currency might be gold or Bitcoin. To maintain purchasing power, White pointed out, one could either commit to repurchasing the currency at a fixed price or constrain its supply, an approach exemplified by Bitcoin.
Bitcoin and Gold
Bitcoin and gold operate under vastly different supply mechanisms. Gold supply can expand in response to rising demand and price, resulting in long-term price stabilization. Similarly, Bitcoin’s supply is pre-determined, impervious to demand changes. Even if price inflation might drive more mining activity, the quantity of Bitcoin remains unchanged.
White argues that this inherent purchasing power volatility in Bitcoin’s design might be a stumbling block in its adoption as a universally accepted medium of exchange. Despite this, he doesn’t expect a widespread shift away from fiat currencies due to their ingrained network effect benefits. However, the exception to this could be in cases of extreme inflation, without a stable alternative fiat currency, as seen when Argentine and Zimbabwean citizens adopted the U.S. dollar.
White sees Bitcoin’s censorship resistance as an advantage over gold, but posits it could be marginalized, as seen in China. This might not eradicate its usage but could inhibit it from becoming a mainstream payment method. White suggests gold, with its widespread presence and significantly higher market capitalization, could potentially outdo Bitcoin if fiat currency collapses.
White also touched on other blockchain alternatives such as an inflation-linked token like Ampleforth’s SPOT token and cryptocurrencies with elastic supplies like PraSaga, on which White serves as an advisor.