Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I've noticed something interesting lately. Mira Murati, the former CTO of OpenAI, is becoming one of the most fascinating figures in the AI world, not for what she has built, but for what she has refused.
For those who don't know her, Murati led the technical development of ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Codex. Before OpenAI, she worked at Tesla, contributing to the Model X, and even earlier at Leap Motion. In short, a solid career in tech, with skills ranging from pure engineering to managing complex projects.
But here’s the point that strikes me: when Meta decided to seriously compete with OpenAI, Mark Zuckerberg made Mira Murati an offer that most people couldn't refuse. One billion dollars. It’s not just a salary — we're talking about stock options, bonuses, leadership position. It’s the kind of offer that changes lives.
And she said no.
It wasn’t a hasty or emotional decision. Over the years, Murati has built a very clear reputation: she’s not interested in money for money’s sake. She has spoken publicly about the importance of developing AI ethically and responsibly, about the need to think long-term, not just short-term profits. Given Meta’s track record on privacy and ethics issues, Murati’s choice to stay independent makes logical sense.
What strikes me is the message this sends. In an industry where everyone chases bigger money and more prestigious titles, Mira Murati has chosen to prioritize principles. It’s not a dramatic public statement; it’s just a decision made and done.
The question that naturally arises is: what kind of leadership do we want to guide the future of AI? Do we want people motivated only by competition and profit, or voices that truly consider the consequences of what they are building?
She resigned as CTO of OpenAI, but her influence in the sector remains strong. Whether she’s launching her own venture, doing consulting, or taking another leadership role, her position in the AI debate is solidified. What Murati is doing, in my opinion, reflects a broader shift happening in tech: true leaders are no longer just chasing traditional success metrics; they are starting to think deeply about what they build and why.
In an increasingly AI-shaped world, figures like Mira Murati are not just important. They are essential.