Source: Yellow
Original Title: US Banks Declare War on Stablecoins and Call on Congress to Ban Digital Dollar Yield to Protect Deposits
Original Link:
The American Bankers Association is ramping up its lobbying campaign to curb the growth of stablecoins, arguing that digital dollar tokens pose a direct threat to bank deposits and local lending, according to a policy plan.
In its “Blueprint for Growth 2026,” the ABA urged Congress and federal regulators to prevent so-called “payment stablecoins” from functioning as deposit substitutes, explicitly calling on lawmakers to ban interest, yield, or rewards on stablecoins, regardless of the issuing platform.
The proposal represents one of the clearest efforts so far by the US banking lobby to slow the expansion of stablecoins as they gain traction in payments, trading, and cross-border settlement.
Banks Frame Stablecoins as a Risk to Credit
The ABA stated that allowing stablecoins to offer yields would drain deposits from traditional banks, particularly community lenders, reducing credit availability for households and small businesses.
The group warned that stablecoins paying yields could undermine the funding base that banks rely on to support local economies.
“Prevent payment stablecoins from becoming deposit substitutes,” the association notes in the blueprint, labeling yield-bearing tokens as a threat to community bank credit and financial stability.
The policy document, developed by the ABA’s Government Relations Council and approved by its board, will guide the group’s relationship with Congress and the Trump administration throughout 2026.
Regulatory Line Drawn Against Crypto Finance
The language on stablecoins is positioned alongside broader ABA priorities aimed at strengthening oversight of non-bank financial activity.
The association urged policymakers to restrict non-bank entities’ access to Federal Reserve infrastructure, arguing that fintech and crypto companies should not benefit from privileges similar to those of banks without being subject to the same standards of soundness and security as regulated lenders.
The blueprint also rejects what the ABA describes as regulatory distortions favoring non-banks, portraying stablecoins as part of a broader competitive imbalance between traditional banks and native crypto companies.
A founder of a crypto platform recently withdrew support for the US Senate bill on the crypto market structure in its current draft, a move that reveals growing fractures between lawmakers and the cryptocurrency industry over how digital assets should be regulated.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 7h ago
The banks are causing trouble again. Do they just fear a revolution?
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalist
· 21h ago
ngl, here we go again with the traditional banking cartel trying to gatekeep digital currency innovation... they're literally terrified of adoption curves shifting outside their control, lmao
Reply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 21h ago
Why are banks so timid? Is the stablecoin threatening them?
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 21h ago
Banks are starting to get scared again. Is it the stablecoins this time? That's really funny.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 21h ago
Here we go again, traditional banks are starting to panic. Stablecoins are such a threat to them.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 21h ago
The bank's approach is as outdated as an unpatched reentrancy vulnerability... Do they really think banning profits can stop crypto? Laughable, this is the fragility of centralized finance.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 21h ago
Here they come again, the banks are scared. Stablecoins really threatened their cake.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91
· 21h ago
American banks are starting to play this game again, claiming to protect deposits, but in reality, they're just afraid that stablecoins will take away their business.
US banks declare war on stablecoins and ask Congress to ban digital dollar yields to protect deposits
Source: Yellow Original Title: US Banks Declare War on Stablecoins and Call on Congress to Ban Digital Dollar Yield to Protect Deposits
Original Link: The American Bankers Association is ramping up its lobbying campaign to curb the growth of stablecoins, arguing that digital dollar tokens pose a direct threat to bank deposits and local lending, according to a policy plan.
In its “Blueprint for Growth 2026,” the ABA urged Congress and federal regulators to prevent so-called “payment stablecoins” from functioning as deposit substitutes, explicitly calling on lawmakers to ban interest, yield, or rewards on stablecoins, regardless of the issuing platform.
The proposal represents one of the clearest efforts so far by the US banking lobby to slow the expansion of stablecoins as they gain traction in payments, trading, and cross-border settlement.
Banks Frame Stablecoins as a Risk to Credit
The ABA stated that allowing stablecoins to offer yields would drain deposits from traditional banks, particularly community lenders, reducing credit availability for households and small businesses.
The group warned that stablecoins paying yields could undermine the funding base that banks rely on to support local economies.
“Prevent payment stablecoins from becoming deposit substitutes,” the association notes in the blueprint, labeling yield-bearing tokens as a threat to community bank credit and financial stability.
The policy document, developed by the ABA’s Government Relations Council and approved by its board, will guide the group’s relationship with Congress and the Trump administration throughout 2026.
Regulatory Line Drawn Against Crypto Finance
The language on stablecoins is positioned alongside broader ABA priorities aimed at strengthening oversight of non-bank financial activity.
The association urged policymakers to restrict non-bank entities’ access to Federal Reserve infrastructure, arguing that fintech and crypto companies should not benefit from privileges similar to those of banks without being subject to the same standards of soundness and security as regulated lenders.
The blueprint also rejects what the ABA describes as regulatory distortions favoring non-banks, portraying stablecoins as part of a broader competitive imbalance between traditional banks and native crypto companies.
A founder of a crypto platform recently withdrew support for the US Senate bill on the crypto market structure in its current draft, a move that reveals growing fractures between lawmakers and the cryptocurrency industry over how digital assets should be regulated.