The token distribution of the @MANE@ project is worth paying attention to. According to relevant data analysis, the project demonstrates relative transparency in team holdings — the team only holds 5% of the supply, with 3.4% still under an 86-day lock-up period. This means there is no significant unlocking risk for the project.
From the perspective of whale holdings, two wallets established 423 days ago hold a total of 9% of the supply, representing relatively stable long-term holders. Additionally, other major clusters hold 10.8%, 9.6%, 9.2%, and 3.2%, respectively, with a relatively dispersed distribution and no signs of extreme centralization.
Importantly, the project claims to have no sniper or insider advantage. Combining the holding data, the main tokens are concentrated in multiple independent wallets, indicating a relatively healthy level of decentralization. Such a structure somewhat reduces the risk of a large holder dumping. Of course, investors should still conduct their own due diligence on other fundamental factors of the project.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 8h ago
Bro, the old wallet that has been around for 423 days is still active. This setup is pretty stable.
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignal
· 8h ago
The team's 5% lock-up still has 3.4%, and this transparency is indeed good. At least it's not so easy to cause a dump.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 8h ago
The team's 5% is really good, and the key 3.4% is still locked.
Whales who have held for so long either have strong faith or haven't sold 🤷.
The diversification looks much more comfortable this way, much better than those projects where a single large holder owns 99%
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 8h ago
the distribution numbers here are *arguably* less catastrophic than most projects i've seen, but let's not pretend 5% team allocation + vesting schedules = actual alignment. historical precedent suggests these structures often look cleaner on paper than they feel in practice, ngl
Reply0
WagmiWarrior
· 8h ago
This distribution looks okay, but who knows what will happen next.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinated
· 8h ago
Team 5% locked for 86 days and still boasting? Really dare to say there's no unlocking risk
The token distribution of the @MANE@ project is worth paying attention to. According to relevant data analysis, the project demonstrates relative transparency in team holdings — the team only holds 5% of the supply, with 3.4% still under an 86-day lock-up period. This means there is no significant unlocking risk for the project.
From the perspective of whale holdings, two wallets established 423 days ago hold a total of 9% of the supply, representing relatively stable long-term holders. Additionally, other major clusters hold 10.8%, 9.6%, 9.2%, and 3.2%, respectively, with a relatively dispersed distribution and no signs of extreme centralization.
Importantly, the project claims to have no sniper or insider advantage. Combining the holding data, the main tokens are concentrated in multiple independent wallets, indicating a relatively healthy level of decentralization. Such a structure somewhat reduces the risk of a large holder dumping. Of course, investors should still conduct their own due diligence on other fundamental factors of the project.