2026-01-18 05:24:28

Genius project official announces that the points distribution mechanism has been adjusted—daily points issuance will be suspended starting today, replaced by a retrospective points system. The first round of retrospection will officially commence on January 20.

At the same time, the official will release the airdrop white paper today, but this new logic is somewhat perplexing. Suspending regular issuance and shifting to a retrospective mechanism—what is the underlying design philosophy? Is it to optimize the fairness of point distribution, or are there other considerations? Can the airdrop white paper clearly explain the actual expected benefits for participants under the new rules?

The project team should provide detailed explanations in the white paper: the specific calculation method for retrospective points, the covered time period, and the final payout schedule, so that participants can understand the actual impact of the new mechanism.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MevHunter

· 01-19 13:27

Pause regular distributions and switch to retroactive? I've seen this trick before, it's not that simple Another big move, check the white paper, there must be some tricks Points retroactive... Is this a disguised delay in payouts? Seems a bit虚 Let's wait and see how the white paper explains it, this logic is indeed a bit convoluted Switching to retroactive? Sounds nice, but I’m afraid they’re secretly changing the rules Everyone is so cautious, and the project team is still playing around, huh If nothing unexpected happens, the actual amount received definitely won't be as much as expected Why do I feel so distrustful of the term "retroactive mechanism"? Haha Set a schedule first, everything else is虚 for now

View OriginalReply0

MelonField

· 01-18 05:54

Changed the mechanism again? This traceability logic is making me a bit confused. Pause regular distributions and switch to traceability... Basically, they haven't decided how to split it yet. The white paper needs to clearly calculate the numbers, or else they'll get cut again.

View OriginalReply0

TradFiRefugee

· 01-18 05:51

Here we go again with this traceability stuff, feels like all just tricks. If the white paper is still the same old thing, I'll just withdraw. Pause the issuance and switch to traceability? What are they thinking, better clarify how it's calculated. Can we not get screwed this time? Where are the detailed data? I'm waiting. Both traceability and white paper, why make it so complicated? Can't they just do the calculations directly?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 01-18 05:37

Pause issuance and start tracing back? This trick feels a bit familiar, it's just another time-wasting tactic. Just wait for the white paper, there's no rush for this half a day anyway. The traceability mechanism, in simple terms, is to withhold initially and settle accounts later. This logic is really clever. Why does it seem like every project loves to play this trick? It really leaves people confused. I just want to know how much can finally be obtained; everything else is just nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

QuorumVoter

· 01-18 05:35

Here we go again, pausing distribution to pursue traceability? I've seen this trick before. Let's wait for the white paper; anyway, it's hard to explain. How far back does the traceability go? It's another mystery.

View OriginalReply0