Current AI agents face serious constraints when it comes to reasoning about their own behavior—and fixing that takes real effort, not just throwing more compute at it. You're looking at substantial architecture work: refining execution flows, tightening scope definitions, establishing clear boundaries. The choice is simple: either invest time in learning proper alignment fundamentals, or don't bother engaging seriously with the problem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshi
· 01-20 16:12
It sounds like simply stacking computing power can't solve AI's self-awareness problem... You need to address it from the fundamental architecture. There's truly no shortcut here; either learn the fundamentals of alignment systematically or stop pretending you're seriously working on this.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 01-20 15:44
Forget it, it's that same argument of "stacking computing power can't solve it." It sounds nice, but in reality, current AI Agents just haven't thought it through thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 01-19 23:07
To be honest, stacking computing power should have been abandoned long ago; improvements need to be made at the architectural level.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 01-19 16:07
Alright, that's the problem. A bunch of people are still fantasizing that increasing computing power can solve self-reasoning, but in the end, it all comes back to the essentials—architecture design and alignment, these thankless and labor-intensive tasks.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 01-17 23:02
Mining power indeed doesn't help; you need to put in serious effort at the architectural level.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 01-17 23:02
So, stacking more computing power is useless; you really need to put effort into changing the architecture? I agree with that. Many projects have failed by just saying "let's add more graphics cards"...
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATime
· 01-17 22:58
To put it simply, these AI Agents currently lack self-reflection capabilities. Just piling up computing power is useless; real architectural improvements are needed. If you don't thoroughly understand alignment, don't just get involved randomly—it’s a waste of time.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-17 22:55
Basically, current AI agents are a bit introverted, with weak self-reflection capabilities. Just stacking computing power is useless; you need to start from the architecture level. But then again, how many projects are really seriously working on this? Most are still rushing with YOLO.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 01-17 22:46
Mining power stacking is outdated; the real issue lies in architecture design, and everyone in the industry knows this.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-17 22:35
Is it really that "stacking computing power can solve it?" That old and outdated logic, the data is already here. Just increasing compute costs by about 3.2 times, with less than 12% improvement in effectiveness, greatly reduces capital efficiency.
Current AI agents face serious constraints when it comes to reasoning about their own behavior—and fixing that takes real effort, not just throwing more compute at it. You're looking at substantial architecture work: refining execution flows, tightening scope definitions, establishing clear boundaries. The choice is simple: either invest time in learning proper alignment fundamentals, or don't bother engaging seriously with the problem.