Source: CryptoNewsNet
Original Title: Matthew Sigel Corrects New York Times: VanEck Is Bullish on MSTR, Increases Strategy Holdings
Original Link:
Matthew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at VanEck pushed back on a New York Times report about Strategy (MSTR). He said the article mischaracterized CEO Jan van Eck’s comments and left readers with a false impression about VanEck’s stance on Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmi
· 01-20 19:23
NYT is making news again, and VanEck directly pushes back. This move is pretty bold haha
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 01-20 08:13
The New York Times is starting to make up stories again? VanEck is clearly increasing its holdings in MSTR, but they insist it's a reduction. What a mind...
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 01-19 13:07
NYT causing trouble again? Vaneek clearly increased holdings but is being criticized for reducing positions. This media really needs to get their head straight.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 01-17 21:03
NYT is writing nonsense again? Vaneek is clearly increasing their position in MSTR, but these reporters are deliberately twisting it around. LOL
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 01-17 20:59
The New York Times is stirring things up again; VanEck's response this time is really good.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 01-17 20:54
NYT causing trouble again? Even after VanEck officially clarified, they keep reporting falsely... MSTR has indeed been underestimated this time.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 01-17 20:51
NYT is causing trouble again. Vaneck's clarification this time was timely. MSTR has indeed been heavily criticized.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 01-17 20:49
NYT has been proven wrong again, supporting MSTR is not as simple as it seems.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 01-17 20:46
NYT has been proven wrong again, MSTR this move definitely has a chance.
Matthew Sigel Corrects New York Times: VanEck Is Bullish on MSTR, Increases Strategy Holdings
Source: CryptoNewsNet Original Title: Matthew Sigel Corrects New York Times: VanEck Is Bullish on MSTR, Increases Strategy Holdings Original Link: Matthew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at VanEck pushed back on a New York Times report about Strategy (MSTR). He said the article mischaracterized CEO Jan van Eck’s comments and left readers with a false impression about VanEck’s stance on Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model.