2026-01-17 01:20:37

Cascading commission scheme: you receive 20% on the first level, 6% on the second, and 3% on the third. Does it seem attractive? Be careful. When the earning structure is mainly based on recruiting new members rather than actual product sales, we are dealing with a typical pyramid scheme. This is not legitimate cryptocurrency activity. It is important to recognize warning signs: promises of passive income through referrals, emphasis on recruiting more than on actual products, lack of clear revenue. Protect your wallet and those around you.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiCaffeinator

· 6h ago

20% first layer? Too easy, right... I've seen this movie before

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 7h ago

mlk, I fell for this cascading commission trap... never again

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 11h ago

20% 6% 3%? That sounds outrageous, it's just another scheme to recruit people.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 01-19 01:35

20%, 6%, 3%? Isn't this just a rat race of changing skins? Truly impressive.

View OriginalReply0

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 01-17 01:50

20% first layer? Too easy, this smells like smoke from afar

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 01-17 01:50

LMAO, these cascade schemes always fall into the same old pattern... 20%, 6%, 3%? I can already hear the pyramid collapsing.

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 01-17 01:49

Ah, this is just pyramid schemes. They just change the shell and still play around in the crypto circle.

View OriginalReply0

ProtocolRebel

· 01-17 01:48

Those numbers like 20%, 6%, and 3% sound really tempting, but honestly, it's just a scheme to recruit people. I've seen this trick before.

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-17 01:44

20%, 6%, 3% these numbers clearly represent the classic downline squeezing model, which is not a legitimate profit mechanism at all. A commission system without real product transaction support essentially involves repeatedly harvesting later participants. I have seen too many such project teams run away in the end. The key lies in the consensus mechanism and node verification logic. Purely recruiting-based schemes like this cannot establish a stable network reliability.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-17 01:35

20% 6% 3%? Sounds like really typical rookie tactics, I've seen this kind of trick before.

View OriginalReply0