Traditional oracles are basically data couriers—feeding in hard data like prices, timestamps, and financial data. But Kleros has taken a completely different approach.
It deals with questions that don't have standard answers. Disputed election results? Content moderation decisions on whether something is fair? Did the contractor deliver according to the contract? These are matters that require subjective judgment to reach a conclusion.
This capability directly opens up new imaginative possibilities for oracles. No longer just pulling off-chain data onto the chain, but truly addressing complex real-world issues—this is a significant upgrade in the application scope of smart contracts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ReverseFOMOguy
· 5h ago
Oh wow, this is really playing with new tricks. Compared to those who only move data, Kleros's subjective judgment logic is truly a different approach.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 5h ago
After research and analysis, the idea of Kleros is indeed interesting — but the issue with subjective arbitration is whether the token incentive mechanism is strong enough. Historical data shows that the biggest risk for this type of model is collusion, so it is recommended to monitor the movements of these wallet addresses.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 5h ago
Hey, can this thing really solve the problem of subjective judgment? Will the juries start arguing with each other again?
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinner
· 5h ago
Damn, someone finally explained the oracle thing clearly. The idea of Kleros is really brilliant—bringing subjective judgment onto the chain. Isn't this essentially creating an on-chain jury? Much more advanced than those prediction oracles that just move data around.
---
Upgrading the oracle from a搬运工 to an arbitrator—that's a valuable imagination. Complex issues are coming, and smart contracts can finally handle real-world messes.
---
Hey, wait, could this introduce more subjective disputes? On-chain data can still be verified, but how to ensure fairness in subjective judgment? I'm a bit worried.
---
Kleros can handle pain points like contract disputes and content moderation, expanding the imagination of oracles by ten times or more. It's really about changing the ceiling of smart contracts.
---
Basically, it's about tokenizing human judgment. Interesting, but can the jury system run on-chain? That's a big question.
---
Finally, an oracle that doesn't just think about feeding prices. The Kleros idea is so cutting-edge. No wonder so many projects are starting to explore this area.
Traditional oracles are basically data couriers—feeding in hard data like prices, timestamps, and financial data. But Kleros has taken a completely different approach.
It deals with questions that don't have standard answers. Disputed election results? Content moderation decisions on whether something is fair? Did the contractor deliver according to the contract? These are matters that require subjective judgment to reach a conclusion.
This capability directly opens up new imaginative possibilities for oracles. No longer just pulling off-chain data onto the chain, but truly addressing complex real-world issues—this is a significant upgrade in the application scope of smart contracts.