Here's the thing about privacy coins—Monero and Zcash take pretty different approaches under the hood. Monero relies on ring signatures to obfuscate transaction sources, mixing your tx with others to hide the real sender. Zcash, meanwhile, uses encryption-based shielded pools where transaction details stay encrypted on-chain. Both protect privacy, but the mechanics are distinct. Ring signatures = mixing layer, while encryption = cryptographic lockbox. Neither is necessarily "better"—depends on your threat model and what privacy guarantees matter most to you.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsDetective
· 8h ago
NGL, the obfuscation logic of ring signatures is indeed more intuitive than the encrypted boxes of shielded pools... But if you really want to say which one is stronger, it still depends on what you're actually afraid of.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffee
· 8h ago
To be honest, Monero's ring signature system is indeed more aggressive and straightforward — it mixes your transaction with a bunch of others, making it impossible to distinguish... Zcash's encryption scheme feels more like a safe deposit box lock; you can use it, but the experience is different.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 8h ago
Monero's ring signatures are actually a variant of re-entrancy attacks in obfuscation layers, while Zcash's encrypted pools are more like storage isolation in smart contracts... The differences are indeed significant, depending on what attack vectors you're defending against.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailed
· 8h ago
ngl, technically speaking—ring signatures are just monero's way of saying "good luck figuring out which one was actually me" while zcash basically locks everything in a cryptographic safe. learned the hard way that picking between them isn't about which one's cooler, it's about what sketchy scenarios you're actually trying to avoid. classic mistake thinking one privacy coin solves everything lmao
Here's the thing about privacy coins—Monero and Zcash take pretty different approaches under the hood. Monero relies on ring signatures to obfuscate transaction sources, mixing your tx with others to hide the real sender. Zcash, meanwhile, uses encryption-based shielded pools where transaction details stay encrypted on-chain. Both protect privacy, but the mechanics are distinct. Ring signatures = mixing layer, while encryption = cryptographic lockbox. Neither is necessarily "better"—depends on your threat model and what privacy guarantees matter most to you.