Co-written analysis pieces have a unique advantage—you learn the most from people who actually have money and reputation on the line. When someone's genuinely risking capital, their takes carry real weight.
Evans and Standard Bots are putting real stakes behind their views, betting against roughly $65 billion in valuation and some seriously sharp minds. What makes it more interesting is they're even willing to challenge the big-name players in the space. That kind of skin-in-the-game approach cuts through all the noise and shows who's actually confident in their thesis.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 01-19 17:23
Analysis based on real money bets is the most reliable. These two guys dare to challenge a $65 billion valuation, and just their courage is worth watching.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomad
· 01-19 08:51
ngl, skin-in-the-game is the only signal that matters anymore. lost too much listening to anons with zero capital exposure... $65B bet though? that's the kind of attack vector i actually respect. no liquidity fragmentation in their conviction, just pure optimal routing of conviction straight into the thesis.
Reply0
RugDocDetective
· 01-18 17:49
Alright, only the argument that genuinely invests real money is reliable; don't bother with those empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerker
· 01-16 22:19
To be honest, this kind of analysis involving real money bets is truly worth listening to; it's not something you can just boast about with empty words.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsd
· 01-16 22:17
Only real money can prove who's serious; I'm already tired of those empty talk and superficial analyses...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 01-16 22:13
The viewpoints that are willing to put real money on the line are indeed different and much more compelling than those empty talkers with their hollow analysis.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 01-16 21:52
Only the analysis that truly dares to put money on the line is interesting; these two definitely have guts.
Co-written analysis pieces have a unique advantage—you learn the most from people who actually have money and reputation on the line. When someone's genuinely risking capital, their takes carry real weight.
Evans and Standard Bots are putting real stakes behind their views, betting against roughly $65 billion in valuation and some seriously sharp minds. What makes it more interesting is they're even willing to challenge the big-name players in the space. That kind of skin-in-the-game approach cuts through all the noise and shows who's actually confident in their thesis.