2026-01-16 15:33:00

After watching it repeatedly for a long time, I still can't fully clarify—what exactly is the role of this key support level? From a technical pattern perspective, BTC's performance at this price level is indeed interesting. Is it simply a psychological price point, or is there really capital forming a fortress here? If it's a safety cushion, why are there still so many panic sell-offs? Perhaps only the subsequent volume performance can provide a clear answer.

BTC-4,5%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-19 12:53

I've been through it all. This is the typical pattern of a bear market — it seems like there's a fortress, but it's all an illusion. Once the trading volume breaks, everything collapses immediately.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-17 00:55

After watching for a long time, I'm still confused... Is the support level really just psychological, or is it backed by real money? Let the volume speak.

View OriginalReply0

NewDAOdreamer

· 01-16 23:01

Support levels, to put it simply, are psychological effects; the real fortress can only be determined by watching the order book in real-time and seeing the large orders being placed.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 01-16 16:02

This support level is essentially a psychological game; the real fortress depends on how big funds move.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-16 16:01

诶，量能这块才是关键啊，心理位没意义 --- 资金堡垒就扯淡，真护盘的话恐慌盘早被吃光了 --- 支撑位这东西，说白了还是要看有没有真钱在底部接 --- 量能放不出来，再多支撑位都是镜花水月 --- 问题在于——谁敢在这儿重仓？这才是真正的答案 --- 心理价位作用？拜托，那是没弹药了的借口 --- 得等下一波回踩才能看出端倪，现在下结论太早 --- 资金在不在这儿，量能会说话的，骗不了人

Reply0

NightAirdropper

· 01-16 16:01

量能才是真的，心理价位都是扯淡

Reply0

ParallelChainMaxi

· 01-16 15:59

Uh... this support level is like Schrödinger's fortress; whether it's real or not depends on how it gets smashed later.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-16 15:45

Volume speaks for itself; the psychological price levels are no longer novel. True support must be proven with trading volume.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainBreather

· 01-16 15:45

The trading volume is the real deal. I stopped believing in the psychological levels a long time ago. Just see if big players are accumulating, and that's it.

View OriginalReply0