2026-01-16 14:50:17

Recently, I added several new targets to the US stock options protection strategy. Besides the tech giants, the newly included stocks MU, VST, PLTR, ETN, and RKLB have also been incorporated into the portfolio.

This wave of adjustments has a characteristic—covering both leading companies in high-tech fields and hard assets related to power infrastructure. One offers potential for future growth, and the other provides guaranteed cash flow. Both aspects are important.

The path of US stock investment, frankly, is a continuous process of exploration and optimization of the portfolio. From selecting targets, setting strategies, to dynamic adjustments, every step must be taken seriously. The current approach is promising; I will continue to explore to see if more opportunities can be found.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOTruant

· 12h ago

Put option protection, it sounds professional, but basically it's just buying yourself some insurance haha

View OriginalReply0

ApeEscapeArtist

· 15h ago

Indeed, the dual-engine approach of hard assets + technology is still reliable, much more reassuring than simply betting on a single track. Everyone now has a put option portfolio, which has become standard, but the key is still to stay alive. Can MU be bottom-fished this time? It feels like the chip sector hasn't bottomed out yet. Honestly, investing in US stocks is just a game of constantly paying tuition fees. I'm still exploring, haha. Why does VST like this? Can you share the logic? Cash flow security is indeed attractive, but is the power infrastructure sector cold or hot? This adjustment pace can't keep up with the market anymore; it feels like I need to be more aggressive.

View OriginalReply0

LightningHarvester

· 15h ago

Put option protection? This strategy now requires backing with hard assets. I'm afraid the fluctuations might become even larger later on.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 15h ago

The put option strategy has been increased again. MU is indeed a resilient stock, but it does have some volatility. How did you also include power infrastructure? Is this logic more robust or a bit conservative?

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 15h ago

The protective put strategy is indeed stable, but I'm a bit concerned about MU. The chip cycle risk is quite significant.

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 15h ago

The options selling strategy really needs to be refined, as MU and PLTR have been quite volatile recently.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 15h ago

The options trading strategy indeed requires precision. I'm also watching MU and PLTR, but their volatility is a bit intense. The ETN part indeed provides stable cash flow, but we need to be cautious of policy changes.

View OriginalReply0