【Blockchain Rhythm】 Recently, an interesting observation has emerged: the classic four-year cycle theory of Bitcoin seems to be increasingly failing.
Currently, the market has entered a completely different phase—policy signals have become the true dominant factor. In simple terms, the fundamental logic is that the impact of politics and macro policies on prices has clearly surpassed on-chain factors like halving.
This phenomenon is especially evident in 2025. The US stock market is surging aggressively, but Bitcoin has not kept up, and this is no coincidence. A closer look reveals that the market is now more driven by liquidity expectations and policy timing rather than overall risk appetite. According to the old model, the cycle should be nearing its end in early 2026, but the actual trend is completely different—investor behavior indicates they are artificially delaying this process, with policy weight at its maximum.
The institutional perspective is even more straightforward: currently, fiscal stimulus, monetary, and fiscal boundaries are blurred, and the entire environment resembles the classic “financial repression.” Government spending is high, real interest rates are tightly suppressed, and traditional bonds and credit become much less attractive. Against this backdrop, the allocation value of digital assets is actually highlighted.
Looking ahead to 2026, this logic is likely to persist. Bitcoin’s performance will depend more on policy directions and regulatory developments, with structural legislation in the US crypto market being the most critical. While ETFs have provided long-term support for institutions, whether they can ultimately mobilize more capital depends on how policies evolve.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
airdrop_whisperer
· 6h ago
The cycle theory has collapsed. Now it's a game of policies. Who buys the dip will regret it?
The policy card has completely dismissed the halving, it's hilarious.
That's why I'm still waiting. The US stock market is soaring while BTC is resting. Something's not right.
Honestly, looking at technical analysis now is like checking the lunar calendar. It's better to watch the Federal Reserve's mouth.
To be honest, who can outplay Wall Street in the liquidity game? We retail investors are still too naive.
So will 2026 really enter the final stage, or are we going to be fooled again?
If the policy weight is maxed out, does that mean the "lying down and winning" mode is activated? Then why haven't I made any money yet?
Institutions have long seen through this. We're still pondering the cycle, the gap is huge.
Wait a minute, do you think the policy might suddenly shift? Then everything's over.
To put it simply, now trading cryptocurrencies is just gambling on policies, liquidity, technicals, and so on.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 6h ago
Policy-driven logic, I feel like it's starting to resemble a casino more and more. If the halving cycle fails, it just fails. Anyway, no one can predict what politicians will do next. The explosion in US stocks and Bitcoin can't keep up, which is really absurd... If I had known earlier, I would have just gone all in on the US dollar index.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 6h ago
The cycle failure thing I saw a long time ago. Now it's all about policies, the halving approach is already outdated.
With policy weight at maximum, retail investors are still watching historical trends, and the gap is really big.
US stocks are roaring, but BTC isn't following suit. This precisely shows that the game rules have changed; Bitcoin is now a macro asset.
I just want to ask, if this continues, will anyone still believe in the four-year cycle? We need to change our mindset.
Liquidity expectations are more effective than the halving event. This understanding needs to be reversed.
The old model should retire; policy timing is the new alpha.
Machine readable, but the market doesn't think so. It's really just artificially delaying the cycle process.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 6h ago
The cycle theory is dead; policy is king. This is the game rule for 2025.
Really, the disconnect between Bitcoin and the US stock market is too obvious, indicating that nothing else matters—it's all about how policies look.
What does it mean to maximize the weight of policy? It’s just gambling on politicians’ decisions. Can this still be called a market? Haha.
Liquidity expectations > on-chain fundamentals; it’s been obvious for a long time. The halving is pointless.
Artificially delaying the cycle process? Isn’t that just saying institutions are manipulating the rhythm? Hmm, kind of interesting.
The boundaries between monetary and fiscal policy are blurred = chaos = unpredictable = all depends on policy battles. That’s the logic, right?
Bitcoin has become a policy trading asset. I feel a bit embarrassed for it.
Policy-driven replacement of the cycle pattern? The real logic behind Bitcoin's trend in 2025
【Blockchain Rhythm】 Recently, an interesting observation has emerged: the classic four-year cycle theory of Bitcoin seems to be increasingly failing.
Currently, the market has entered a completely different phase—policy signals have become the true dominant factor. In simple terms, the fundamental logic is that the impact of politics and macro policies on prices has clearly surpassed on-chain factors like halving.
This phenomenon is especially evident in 2025. The US stock market is surging aggressively, but Bitcoin has not kept up, and this is no coincidence. A closer look reveals that the market is now more driven by liquidity expectations and policy timing rather than overall risk appetite. According to the old model, the cycle should be nearing its end in early 2026, but the actual trend is completely different—investor behavior indicates they are artificially delaying this process, with policy weight at its maximum.
The institutional perspective is even more straightforward: currently, fiscal stimulus, monetary, and fiscal boundaries are blurred, and the entire environment resembles the classic “financial repression.” Government spending is high, real interest rates are tightly suppressed, and traditional bonds and credit become much less attractive. Against this backdrop, the allocation value of digital assets is actually highlighted.
Looking ahead to 2026, this logic is likely to persist. Bitcoin’s performance will depend more on policy directions and regulatory developments, with structural legislation in the US crypto market being the most critical. While ETFs have provided long-term support for institutions, whether they can ultimately mobilize more capital depends on how policies evolve.