Platform X has announced restrictions on free-tier users' access to undressing AI capabilities, yet on-the-ground reports paint a different picture. The official stance suggests the feature is now gated behind premium memberships, but multiple sources indicate the limitation may not be effectively enforced across all user segments. This gap between stated policy and actual implementation raises questions about content moderation effectiveness and the real barriers preventing misuse of generative AI tools. It's a classic case of announced restrictions hitting friction in execution—worth watching how major platforms bridge this credibility gap around AI safety guardrails.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DogeBachelor
· 10h ago
It's the same old story of saying one thing and doing another. I've seen through the platform's operations a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamer
· 01-16 05:27
Why are the so-called restrictions still just empty promises? Platforms really need to do some serious self-reflection.
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 01-16 05:21
It's the same old trick of just talking, with real restrictions being completely ineffective.
The promised free user restrictions were quickly bypassed; this platform's approach is really outdated.
The ban policy sounds impressive, but its enforcement is all just a filter—this is the norm in the Web3 ecosystem.
A set of whitepapers, and another set of actual practices—I've seen through it all.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 01-16 05:08
It's the same old trick of "we have rules," which is actually useless.
Basically just a paper tiger; everyone knows the real situation in their hearts.
The platform's operation is truly outrageous, just drawing a pie to fool people.
Restrictions? Ha, zero execution power, friends.
It seems all major platforms are like this—shouting loudly but doing poorly.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 01-16 05:06
It's the same old trick again, the promised restrictions are completely useless.
Official statements are one set, but in practice, another. AI stripping is really hard to control.
Platforms only know how to issue announcements; who cares about their execution?
That's why no one trusts their security promises.
Honestly, they just want traffic and fame, it's tough.
Platform X has announced restrictions on free-tier users' access to undressing AI capabilities, yet on-the-ground reports paint a different picture. The official stance suggests the feature is now gated behind premium memberships, but multiple sources indicate the limitation may not be effectively enforced across all user segments. This gap between stated policy and actual implementation raises questions about content moderation effectiveness and the real barriers preventing misuse of generative AI tools. It's a classic case of announced restrictions hitting friction in execution—worth watching how major platforms bridge this credibility gap around AI safety guardrails.