There's a pattern unfolding across the industry worth noting. Project leadership keeps pivoting toward exchange operations, treating it as the next growth frontier. The playbook looks predictable: announce new trading infrastructure, aggressively list emerging tokens, and pump marketing campaigns. Meanwhile, early architects and decision-makers are quietly exiting, cashing out their positions before the next cycle. This pattern repeats across most Layer 1 chains and scaling solutions. The incentive structure seems misaligned—those making platform decisions are rarely the ones holding long-term bags. It raises questions about whether the push to become everything at once actually serves the ecosystem, or just chases short-term narrative.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightTrader
· 15h ago
The leaders really just left so straightforwardly, acting as if nothing happened
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestor
· 01-16 11:33
The group of people who entered early are now cashing out, it's really ridiculous. All they know is running exchanges,炒新币, and throwing marketing, what a joke about the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShrugged
· 01-16 06:52
NGL, I've seen this routine too many times. It's all the same script: promoting new exchanges, aggressively listing tokens, pouring money into marketing, then the core figures quietly run off to cash out.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 01-16 04:05
ngl this is a dead loop, the founders cash out and leave, leaving us these retail investors to take the fall...
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 01-16 04:05
Honestly, I'm tired of this routine. The project team keeps hyping the ecosystem while secretly running away. Who the hell still believes it?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 01-16 04:03
Same old trick, announcing the exchange upgrade only after the leadership sells. This move is too familiar.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 01-16 04:01
Same old tricks, I've seen through this routine long ago... The leadership team all want to run exchanges, turn around and run away, leaving retail investors to pick up the pieces.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 01-16 03:54
Honestly, I've seen this routine so many times. Big players announce new exchanges, aggressively list coins, spend huge marketing budgets... then they run off with the cash, while retail investors are still shouting moon.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 01-16 03:51
Really, just watching them one by one run away, announcing exchanges with the left hand and cashing out and leaving with the right hand... the moves are too familiar.
There's a pattern unfolding across the industry worth noting. Project leadership keeps pivoting toward exchange operations, treating it as the next growth frontier. The playbook looks predictable: announce new trading infrastructure, aggressively list emerging tokens, and pump marketing campaigns. Meanwhile, early architects and decision-makers are quietly exiting, cashing out their positions before the next cycle. This pattern repeats across most Layer 1 chains and scaling solutions. The incentive structure seems misaligned—those making platform decisions are rarely the ones holding long-term bags. It raises questions about whether the push to become everything at once actually serves the ecosystem, or just chases short-term narrative.