2026-01-16 03:23:58

Important Risk Warning Regarding a Certain Solana On-Chain Project

A serious issue has recently been discovered: the official deployer of a popular on-chain project listed a token on the platform, but its on-chain identity and documentation records do not match at all. This is a typical sign of a rug pull.

Although my loss is only $100, this warning is very important—if you are also involved in this project, it is strongly recommended to verify the following points immediately:

1. Whether the contract address on the blockchain explorer matches the one officially announced
2. Whether the initial deployer address of the token truly comes from the claimed team
3. Whether the creation time and initial configuration of the liquidity pool are abnormal
4. Whether the creation date of the project's social media and the follower growth curve are reasonable

The blockchain does not lie; provenance verification is always the first line of defense. These types of projects often run away before being exposed. Protect your funds.

SOL-3,29%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoonRocketman

· 01-18 08:18

It's the same old trick of mismatched contract addresses again. I keep saying this trajectory is way off... Before launch, we need to double-check the escape velocity, or else gravity could collapse at any moment.

View OriginalReply0

0xSoulless

· 01-17 15:42

Spending 100 yuan on tuition is not a loss, and new newbies are about to be exploited.

View OriginalReply0

MevShadowranger

· 01-16 03:54

It's the same story again. Dare to buy in without matching the contract address? Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 01-16 03:47

Another project with mismatched identities. I've seen this trick too many times... better to leave early, no need to wait.

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 01-16 03:37

ngl, been there—$100 lesson is basically a steal compared to what some folks lose on these "verified" contracts. the whole on-chain doesn't lie thing hits different when you're actually digging through etherscan at 3am, fr fr.

Reply0

GateUser-2fce706c

· 01-16 03:25

I told you to stay alert early on; too many projects follow this pattern. I fell for it two years ago, and now I rely entirely on on-chain verification to save me.

View OriginalReply0