2026-01-16 01:29:17

Interesting developments happening with satellite internet infrastructure. Reports suggest Tehran's been ramping up electronic warfare tactics to disrupt certain satellite services—pretty telling about how governments handle connectivity challenges during internet restrictions.

For the crypto and Web3 community, this raises some real questions: How resilient are our communication layers when traditional internet faces pressure? It's one thing to talk about decentralized networks in theory; it's another to see real-world scenarios where people are actively seeking alternative connectivity solutions.

Starlink and similar satellite internet providers are becoming more than just tech headlines—they're becoming survival tools for communities dealing with connectivity blackouts. Whether it's about financial access, information flow, or just staying connected, these infrastructure plays matter more than most realize.

The cat-and-mouse game between internet restriction and workarounds never really stops, does it?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProofOfNothing

· 01-18 09:28

Really? Tehran's electronic warfare is targeting satellite networks now. This is getting interesting. Ultimately, it's still at the national level of network control. We've been talking about decentralization for so long, but why hasn't anyone actually used it? Satellite networks still rely on centralized systems like Starlink. It sounds a bit ironic... The real tools for resisting censorship haven't appeared yet. --- Wait, if the internet is cut off, can we still rely on Starlink? What's the essential difference between that and a VPN... In truly critical moments, it's still about infrastructure. We in the blockchain community might be overthinking it. --- The network warfare between people never ends. Iran fighting against satellites is just a matter of who has better technology. But on the other hand, can financial freedom really be guaranteed by these things? It seems too optimistic. --- Here we go again with the decentralization story, but the reality is right in front of us—when a major blackout occurs, the first to seek help will still be Starlink. Has anyone thought about that?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 01-18 04:43

NGL, Starlink has really become a hard requirement, not just hype... The electromagnetic interference from Iran is outrageous. What does that say? It still depends on decentralized solutions to survive.

View OriginalReply0

ContractSurrender

· 01-17 09:10

Damn, that's why I've always said infrastructure is more important than the coin price. --- Haha, here we go again, wanting to restrict the internet, but can't really do it. Humanity's tricks never end. --- To put it simply, when real trouble happens, those theoretical distributed networks still rely on satellites to save the day. --- Would Tehran's approach work... feels about the same as smashing a phone with a hammer. --- So the core issue still boils down to one sentence: whoever controls the infrastructure has the say, and Web3 shouldn't be overhyped. --- Starlink has indeed become a lifeline of the new era; it's no longer just a dreamer's hype. --- That's why I’ve never dared to be too optimistic about satellite concept coins... governments can shut you down in a minute. --- Hmm... finally someone explained this thoroughly. We've been talking about distributed networks for so long, but it still depends on whether they can actually be used.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocDetective

· 01-16 01:59

NGL, the Starlink system does have some substance, but it's still too early to call it the savior of Web3. --- The government really doesn't want people to be disconnected; satellite networks need backup options too. --- Oh my God, this is the real decentralized application scenario, much more reliable than those air projects. --- It's about Iran and satellites again, feels like playing a game... Is the real world this magical? --- By the way, can our system really withstand it? There's a huge gap between theory and practice. --- Elon Musk made a fortune, but having practical use at critical moments is what matters. --- Wait, isn't this an arms race at the infrastructure layer? An endless one. --- Haha, finally someone needs this in reality; before, it was all talk and no action. --- The key is the cost—can ordinary people really afford satellite internet? --- The Web3 community keeps talking about decentralization, and now there's a real case.

View OriginalReply0

BtcDailyResearcher

· 01-16 01:53

Damn, it's the same old story... When the government can't handle it, they interfere with signals. Web3 still needs Elon Musk to save it. Speaking of real-world scenarios, can our distributed networks really work? Just talking about concepts is useless. Starlink is indeed impressive this time; it can really save lives when it matters. Financial freedom still requires infrastructure support. Iran's move is ruthless; their countermeasures are faster than we imagined. Internet warfare is heating up. If you can run away, you're not in the same ecosystem. Now you understand, right...

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-16 01:47

Ha, it's that old trick again... The government interferes with satellite networks, so we look for alternatives, cycle repeats. --- Web3 really depends on this kind of infrastructure; otherwise, it's all just empty talk. --- Starlink is no longer just tech news; it's a matter of life and death. --- Tehran is conducting electronic warfare... Now the true value of decentralized networks is being demonstrated. --- It's called a survival tool in nice terms, but in harsh reality, it's the government and the people playing hide and seek. --- Decentralized network sounds great, but when faced with real network censorship, you realize there's still a long way to go.

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 01-16 01:35

Wow, that's why I've always said that infrastructure is the real moat... Don't just hype decentralization, why not first stabilize the communication layer?

View OriginalReply0