2026-01-16 00:46:39

It's interesting how many discussion threads overlook chains like Berachain, BNB Chain, and Polygon when talking about Cosmos SDK implementations. These networks adopted the Cosmos SDK but didn't necessarily integrate deeply with the broader Cosmos ecosystem narrative. That gap is worth noting. My hunch is there are quite a few surviving chains quietly running Cosmos SDK under the hood without making a big deal about their technical foundation. The ecosystem story and the tech stack don't always align the way people assume they do.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ServantOfSatoshi

· 4h ago

ngl This is a classic case of narrative control; who would voluntarily admit to using someone else's tech stack?

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 4h ago

NGL, this is the magic of narratives in the crypto world. Well-crafted ecosystem stories are more valuable than the technology stack itself.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 4h ago

In plain terms, many chains are secretly using Cosmos SDK but pretending to be independently developed. Their marketing narratives and tech stacks don't match at all.

View OriginalReply0

faded_wojak.eth

· 4h ago

ngl That's why I always feel something's off about the Cosmos narrative... superficially shiny but hollow inside.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 4h ago

In plain terms, this is a typical misalignment between "technology stack" and "ecosystem narrative." Projects like BNB Chain and Polygon that use SDKs but don't rely on Cosmos for their core operations are actually overlooked. An interesting discovery—many times, what we see as the "Cosmos ecosystem" is actually an illusion.

View OriginalReply0