Source: CryptoNewsNet
Original Title: Polymarket Faces ‘Information Laundering’ Fears After Iran and Maduro Bets
Original Link:
Overview
Polymarket is facing fresh scrutiny after a cluster of high-risk geopolitical bets raised fears that prediction markets are being used to launder inside information into public narratives.
The controversy follows the now-infamous Maduro trade earlier this month.
Insider Trading Allegations on Venezuela
Earlier this month, an anonymous wallet turned a $30,000 bet into more than $400,000 by wagering that Venezuela’s president would be removed from office just hours before the operation unfolded.
Blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain now shows that two of the three wallets tied to those profits have been inactive for 11 days, adding to speculation that law enforcement or exchanges may have intervened.
The third wallet, however, has re-emerged and placed a new wager two days ago predicting that Iran’s Supreme Leader would be out of power by January 31, a market that remains open as nationwide protests continue across Iran.
Iran Market Volatility and Losses
Meanwhile, Polymarket traders have already suffered major losses on Iran-related bets.
Earlier this week, one large wallet placed a heavy “Yes” position on whether the United States would strike Iran by January 14. As protests escalated and Iran temporarily closed its airspace, Polymarket odds surged to 51%, with nearly $50 million in trading volume flowing into the market.
But the strike never happened. Iran reopened its airspace after four hours, and the market resolved “No,” wiping out significant positions and turning a potential $160,000 payout into a total loss of about $40,000.
The Information Laundering Concern
That failed trade has not calmed concerns. Instead, analysts now argue that some traders may be using prediction markets to shape, not just predict, geopolitical narratives.
This tactic has become known as “information laundering.” It involves placing an early bet, allowing copy-traders and social media to amplify the trade, then reversing position once the market moves. Because prediction market odds are widely shared on social media as real-time signals of geopolitical risk, a single well-timed bet can generate headlines, trigger trading bots, and move sentiment before any public confirmation exists.
Regulatory Response
Lawmakers are already watching closely. After the Maduro trade, a representative introduced the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026, which would ban government officials from trading on markets tied to government actions when they hold nonpublic information.
The bill has dozens of co-sponsors but has not yet moved to a vote and has no companion legislation in the Senate.
So far, no evidence links the Iran trades to government insiders. But the pattern of sudden large bets, viral odds shifts, and rapid reversals is pushing prediction markets into a new and more dangerous spotlight. The risk now is not just who is betting, but how those bets themselves may be shaping what the world believes is about to happen.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Polymarket Faces 'Information Laundering' Fears After Iran and Maduro Bets
Source: CryptoNewsNet Original Title: Polymarket Faces ‘Information Laundering’ Fears After Iran and Maduro Bets Original Link:
Overview
Polymarket is facing fresh scrutiny after a cluster of high-risk geopolitical bets raised fears that prediction markets are being used to launder inside information into public narratives.
The controversy follows the now-infamous Maduro trade earlier this month.
Insider Trading Allegations on Venezuela
Earlier this month, an anonymous wallet turned a $30,000 bet into more than $400,000 by wagering that Venezuela’s president would be removed from office just hours before the operation unfolded.
Blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain now shows that two of the three wallets tied to those profits have been inactive for 11 days, adding to speculation that law enforcement or exchanges may have intervened.
The third wallet, however, has re-emerged and placed a new wager two days ago predicting that Iran’s Supreme Leader would be out of power by January 31, a market that remains open as nationwide protests continue across Iran.
Iran Market Volatility and Losses
Meanwhile, Polymarket traders have already suffered major losses on Iran-related bets.
Earlier this week, one large wallet placed a heavy “Yes” position on whether the United States would strike Iran by January 14. As protests escalated and Iran temporarily closed its airspace, Polymarket odds surged to 51%, with nearly $50 million in trading volume flowing into the market.
But the strike never happened. Iran reopened its airspace after four hours, and the market resolved “No,” wiping out significant positions and turning a potential $160,000 payout into a total loss of about $40,000.
The Information Laundering Concern
That failed trade has not calmed concerns. Instead, analysts now argue that some traders may be using prediction markets to shape, not just predict, geopolitical narratives.
This tactic has become known as “information laundering.” It involves placing an early bet, allowing copy-traders and social media to amplify the trade, then reversing position once the market moves. Because prediction market odds are widely shared on social media as real-time signals of geopolitical risk, a single well-timed bet can generate headlines, trigger trading bots, and move sentiment before any public confirmation exists.
Regulatory Response
Lawmakers are already watching closely. After the Maduro trade, a representative introduced the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026, which would ban government officials from trading on markets tied to government actions when they hold nonpublic information.
The bill has dozens of co-sponsors but has not yet moved to a vote and has no companion legislation in the Senate.
So far, no evidence links the Iran trades to government insiders. But the pattern of sudden large bets, viral odds shifts, and rapid reversals is pushing prediction markets into a new and more dangerous spotlight. The risk now is not just who is betting, but how those bets themselves may be shaping what the world believes is about to happen.