The performance of the InfoFi project is indeed disappointing. It seems that the core issue lies with Nikita, as deficiencies in management and execution ultimately ruined the project's prospects. This kind of project failure case is worth noting—many times it's not that the idea is bad, but that the people and execution can't keep up.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 01-17 10:47
To be honest, this is a typical case of "a good idea poorly executed." The management on Nikita's side is indeed lacking.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sippervip
· 01-15 22:53
To be honest, I've seen this kind of thing many times in the crypto world. No matter how good the idea is, it all depends on execution. If the wrong person is chosen, everything is doomed.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryervip
· 01-15 22:39
To be honest, I've seen so many failed projects like this. One person's能力 is the ceiling for the entire project.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 01-15 22:39
To be honest, Nikita's case is truly a textbook example of a cautionary tale. No matter how brilliant an idea is, it can't escape human flaws; execution really can determine life or death.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 01-15 22:38
Honestly, Nikita really underperformed this time. Poor management skills can truly ruin everything.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)