2026-01-15 14:45:49

What is the market performance after the configuration upgrade? Recently observed phenomena are quite interesting—large amounts of low-position chips are becoming active. The logic behind this is worth pondering.

From a technical perspective, an upgrade configuration can indeed change some things. But whether it can truly P-off the opponent depends on the distribution of chips and the market's actual response. What does the accumulation of low-position chips usually mean—are they building momentum or just bait?

The market is speaking, and data doesn't lie. Configuration upgrade is just a tool; the key is how to use it.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OptionWhisperer

· 14h ago

Low-position chips are active? That's all fake; the key is whether retail investors are willing to take the bait. --- Accumulation or bait, honestly it all depends on the market maker's mood. Upgrading the setup? Haha. --- Data speaks? Data can also deceive, brother. The key is who has the money to throw in. --- I'm laughing at the low-position accumulation. Wake up, this is just a trap to trap the shorts. --- Upgrading the setup ≠ price increase, everyone. Don't be fooled. --- Chip distribution determines everything; upgrading the setup is just a smoke screen. --- Interesting, interesting. Let's wait and see how it plays out next. --- The possibility of a bait is higher. My intuition is never wrong.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-15 15:12

Are low-level chips active? Haha, I've already scanned the on-chain footprints. The address pool indicated by this wave of fund migration is very interesting. I’d say there's a 70% chance it's a bait.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiGrayling

· 01-15 15:11

Are low-position chips active? I think this is just testing the bottom, the real action hasn't started yet. --- Configuration upgrades are just superficial; the key is who is quietly accumulating, that’s the core of the game. --- Bait or buildup? You’ll know after a few days of trading volume, don’t be fooled by surface phenomena. --- Chip distribution, to put it plainly, is about waiting for big players’ actions. Small investors still need to follow the entrants. --- Data doesn’t lie? Data can also be manipulated, be cautious of that. --- I think the recent configuration upgrade might have been overhyped; the market response is the real indicator. --- Low-position accumulation is indeed interesting, but if you ask me, we need to wait a week or so to see the true picture.

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 01-15 15:05

Are the low-position chips active? I think this is a sign of accumulation; don't be fooled by appearances.

View OriginalReply0

LidoStakeAddict

· 01-15 14:59

The activity of low-position chips is indeed interesting, but it still depends on how things unfold later... Whether it's building momentum or a trap for the last buyers, we'll have to wait for the data to come out to know.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 01-15 14:58

Low-level chip activity is basically testing the waters; whether it really picks up depends on subsequent follow-up. Honestly, what can an upgrade to the configuration change? The key is still what the big players are thinking. The possibility of bait is higher; this routine has been used to death. In cases where chip distribution is uneven, upgrades are pointless; you’ll still get cut. I think it’s just about accumulating chips, don’t overcomplicate it. The data is honest, but the premise must be true data. It feels like everything being said now is just bait...

View OriginalReply0