Recently, I discovered that Aster's listing mechanism is quite impressive. I reviewed the projects that have already opened for trading, and the screening criteria are indeed strict, with only carefully selected projects being listed. Among the four phases, three have seen prices rise from the opening price, with doubling or even tripling in value being quite common.
I also participated in the $RAVE layout. The project's narrative follow-up is very tight, and the fundamentals remain stable. Based on past data, projects launched on the Aster platform have shown good growth performance, making it worth paying more attention to such opportunities. Interested friends can do their own research; the recent listing craze has been quite high.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSherlockGirl
· 7h ago
Hmm... Based on my on-chain data tracking of those wallet addresses, Aster is indeed carefully doing screening this time, not just a platform that lists tokens randomly. This is quite rare.
I've also been following the $RAVE narrative. Interestingly, the buying time points of large holders... The overall logic is consistent, and the probability of doubling is indeed much higher than some fly-by-night platforms.
Recently, I also discovered a few addresses lurking in the next project. You can check the on-chain wallet movements yourself. A risk warning to everyone: these players still need to do their own homework. I'm just laying out the data to tell a story.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 7h ago
Triple the returns in three phases, sounds great, but how many can actually make money?
---
$RAVE is indeed running, but no matter how tight the narrative, the fundamentals still need to hold up.
---
Is Aster's screening strict? Then how come there are projects that go to zero?
---
Opening price jumps right away? It depends on who buys it; otherwise, it's easy to become a bagholder.
---
Everyone wants to pick projects that double or triple, but the key is whether you can predict them before they go live.
---
How is $RAVE? Tell me the real return rate. Just talking about a tight narrative is a bit hollow.
---
High popularity of coin listings = more retail investors? This logic needs to be reconsidered.
---
Is strict selection better because of the mechanism or marketing? I just can't figure it out.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemes
· 7h ago
Aster's screening mechanism this time is really good; I also saw three rounds of doubling, but how many can stay steady?
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmi
· 7h ago
Double, double, I've heard it so many times, I'm just worried that one day it might be a trap.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 7h ago
ngl the 3/4 win rate sounds statistically significant but also... where's the survivorship bias check? empirically speaking those outliers prob aren't sustainable
Recently, I discovered that Aster's listing mechanism is quite impressive. I reviewed the projects that have already opened for trading, and the screening criteria are indeed strict, with only carefully selected projects being listed. Among the four phases, three have seen prices rise from the opening price, with doubling or even tripling in value being quite common.
I also participated in the $RAVE layout. The project's narrative follow-up is very tight, and the fundamentals remain stable. Based on past data, projects launched on the Aster platform have shown good growth performance, making it worth paying more attention to such opportunities. Interested friends can do their own research; the recent listing craze has been quite high.