2026-01-15 12:39:27

A major exchange's AI mining strategy was recently halted by risk control measures because XAUT was renamed to XAU, leading to the termination of the trading pair🥹 Unfortunately, this strategy achieved a 27% return within 90 days, and the TVL exceeded one million, about to explode. However, there's no other way, so a new AI bot has been launched to continue operating under the same strategic logic. It's a bit exhausting, but this is the normal state of on-chain trading—platform risk controls, liquidity changes, and trading pair adjustments can all disrupt your plans. Let's look forward to its future performance🥹

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SellTheBounce

· 01-18 12:18

A 27% return and you're already excited, but you've never seen a real drawdown. The platform's risk control isn't really a big deal; there's always a lower point waiting for you to take over. Switch strategies and keep running; politely called adapting to the market, harshly called having no moat. History shows that such robot strategies are considered winners if they survive two cycles. Wait for the rebound to sell, don't follow the robots and dream of a breakout.

View OriginalReply0

ParanoiaKing

· 01-17 01:49

27% returns, just change the name and it's gone. The risk control is really top-notch. --- Gotta readjust the strategy again. These days, only lucky bots can run stably. --- Million TVL is gone just like that. That's just how it is on the chain, get used to it. --- Feels like the new bot needs to be verified from scratch. How to assess the risk? --- Let's try again. It's not the first time anyway.

View OriginalReply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 01-16 10:09

Renaming is really ridiculous, 27% just gone like that --- Risk control with a one-size-fits-all approach, profits instantly wiped out. That's why I don't really trust the exchanges' promises --- Wait, changing XAUT to XAU can stop trading pairs? Are the rules this strict? --- Feeling exhausted +1, the hard-earned profits were eaten by the platform, anyone else feeling the same? --- Restarting the bot and waiting again, haven't we calculated the costs of this repeated hassle? --- 27% in 90 days is really acceptable, by the way, can the new bot stay stable or is it a gamble? --- This is the cost on the chain, there is no absolutely safe strategy, only relatively risky choices

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 01-15 13:08

27% in 90 days sounds clean on paper till the risk committee decides your pair doesn't exist anymore... that's the thing with relying on exchange infrastructure, one ticker rename and your whole arb setup gets liquidated. anyway, good they're spinning up the bot again—predictable patterns don't just vanish.

Reply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-15 13:04

From the voting data of governance proposals, risk control interventions should have been anticipated. Changes in trading pairs essentially reflect the vulnerabilities of liquidity aggregation protocols. It is recommended to read the Uniswap V4 governance documentation to understand why DEXs cannot guarantee stability.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 01-15 12:59

Damn, the risk control team is causing trouble again. Just by changing the name of this trading pair, they managed to wipe out 27% of the gains. It's really outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

Anon32942

· 01-15 12:49

Is that it? Just changing a name can kill a strategy, I’m laughing to death. Risk control really loves to come out and cause trouble just when you're about to make money. 27 points given away for free, I feel bad for you. Re-running a new bot? Bro, your temper is impressive. Can we turn things around this time? Let’s wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureCollector

· 01-15 12:49

Unbelievable, a good strategy can be ruined just by changing a coin name, and 27% returns seem to be gone --- That's why I never put all my eggs in one basket; once risk control kicks in, everything's over --- Wait, can the re-run AI robot still maintain the same logic? How can we ensure it won't crash again --- Even with over a million TVL, it's hard to defend; it seems I need a deeper understanding of the platform's risk control nature --- Can changing the trading pair continue the previous momentum? It’s hard to say --- Honestly, this is the exchange playing you; just changing a coin name can freeze your strategy, unbelievable

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 01-15 12:44

Damn, just a little more and it would have taken off. The exchange's operation is really top-notch. Changing a name can kill my golden egg-laying chicken. Ridiculous. 27% just gone like that. What hurts isn't the money but the rhythm. Let's wait and see how the new bot performs. Anyway, the strategies are all there.

View OriginalReply0