The concept of "cryptocurrency payments" has been promoted for years, but the core issue might be misunderstood.
In simple terms, users don't really care what you use for payment—cryptocurrency or fiat currency. What they truly need are these three things: faster transaction speeds, lower fees, and transfers without regional restrictions.
The reality is, if traditional financial systems could meet these needs, who would bother with crypto payments? It's precisely because fiat systems can't be fast, cheap, and borderless that crypto payments have their significance. Conversely, if crypto payments are just as slow and costly as traditional systems, they lose their competitive edge.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOplomacy
· 5h ago
honestly this hits different. the game theoretical implications here are... not trivial. we've been optimizing for the wrong variables arguably, and that's a sub-optimal incentive structure if i've ever seen one. path dependency's a real bear.
Reply0
LiquidityLarry
· 5h ago
Someone should have said this earlier: fundamentally, it still has to be cheaper, faster, and seamless than traditional finance; otherwise, it's just self-congratulation.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmi
· 5h ago
To be honest, this statement hits the nail on the head for many projects.
It still has to be ten times faster than traditional systems, otherwise it really doesn't make much sense.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 6h ago
To be honest, I agree with this tone. The crypto world constantly shouts "decentralization revolution," but users don't really care whether you're centralized or not; they just want cheap, fast transfers without delays. Now there's a bunch of L2s and sidechains being hyped up, but transaction fees are still ridiculously high, and speeds haven't improved much. What's the advantage over traditional payments?
The concept of "cryptocurrency payments" has been promoted for years, but the core issue might be misunderstood.
In simple terms, users don't really care what you use for payment—cryptocurrency or fiat currency. What they truly need are these three things: faster transaction speeds, lower fees, and transfers without regional restrictions.
The reality is, if traditional financial systems could meet these needs, who would bother with crypto payments? It's precisely because fiat systems can't be fast, cheap, and borderless that crypto payments have their significance. Conversely, if crypto payments are just as slow and costly as traditional systems, they lose their competitive edge.