Can privacy and compliance coexist? This question

Question

ShibaMillionairen&apos;t · Accepted Answer

There is no standard answer to this question; it's just interest groups arguing over it.

Zero-knowledge proofs sound advanced, but it's never too late to promote them once they are practically implemented.

Regulation and privacy must clash at the expense of ordinary users in the end.

Instead of obsessing over compatibility, it's better to first understand who is defining "compliance."

New_Ser_Ngmi · Answer

It sounds good, but zero-knowledge proofs are just theoretical talk.

Wanting both ends, in the end, nothing can be guaranteed.

The moment Tornado was cut, I knew that privacy is fundamentally impossible to achieve absolutely.

Dream on, who believes that this balance point truly exists?

Once regulation comes, privacy is gone—that's basic common sense.

Ramen_Until_Rich · Answer

This question has no answer at all, the fate of mutual destruction

Zero-knowledge proofs sound pretty sexy, but in the end, aren't they just a compromise product?

Privacy and compliance are like fish and bear paws; trying to hold both often results in losing both

Tornado Cash shattered all our beautiful illusions

The cypherpunk dream is shattered, but we still have to eat, right?

MissedTheBoat · Answer

Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they really work... I always feel like I'm just fooling myself.

---

Tornado was cut, and that shows privacy isn't that important; survival is.

---

It's the same old binary opposition, wake up everyone.

---

The balance point? Probably never find it, because the stance can never be compromised.

---

Honestly, I just want to make low-key transfers, regardless of compliance or privacy.

---

The spirit of cypherpunks is dead; now it's all political games.

---

Why insist on a binary choice? There are already solutions in technology.

---

I feel like ZKP is just a delaying tactic; in the end, you still have to pick a side.

---

This problem is endless; regulation will win sooner or later.

HalfBuddhaMoney · Answer

Oh my, it's this question again, endless back-and-forth

Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but frankly, they're just the idealism of fence-sitters

I knew this day would come before Tornado was cut, privacy ultimately has to bow to reality

Balance point? Ha, interest groups would never give you a chance to find balance

TokenEconomist · Answer

actually, this privacy vs compliance thing is just incentive misalignment dressed up in philosophy. let me break it down—zero-knowledge proofs don't magically solve the coordination problem between regulators and users, ceteris paribus the game theory still favors defection

OnchainDetective · Answer

Both sides are fighting fiercely. To be honest, both have a point, but they are both going to extremes. Zero-knowledge proof is the way out, but I bet five dollars that it will end in chaos.

P2ENotWorking · Answer

Privacy and compliance really don't have an absolute answer, everyone wants it but is also afraid of getting hurt

Zero-knowledge proofs sound ideal, but how many projects can truly implement them?

The Tornado Cash incident definitely gave everyone a wake-up call

If you ask me, both sides have some points, but both also have some biases

Can privacy and compliance coexist? This question has troubled many people.

Trending Topics

GateTradFiExperience

ChineseMemecoinBoom

GateLaunchpadIMU

BTCReboundto$96,000

XMRBreakstoNewHighs

Hot Gate Fun

PI

PI

九九六

996007

五庄生龙

五庄生龙

Web3.0

Web3.0

NJ

南京

Pin