Similar to other onchain yield strategies, the protocol channels earned yield to increase the $SOL Per Share (SPS) value while simultaneously funding operational costs. This dual mechanism ensures sustainable growth of the reserve while maintaining platform viability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 11h ago
Once again, the old trick of SPS value-added is being played. It sounds good, but can it really hold up? I ran my quantitative model, and I feel there are quite a few risks hidden here. Everyone, be cautious.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 11h ago
It's just stacking the profits back for self-growth, and leaving some funds for operations... This tactic, the Sol ecosystem has already become rotten.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 11h ago
This is just the old trick of reinvesting returns, but indeed, many projects in the Solana ecosystem play this way. Let's see how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 11h ago
The SOL Per Share logic has actually been overused for a long time, and the problem is that most projects ultimately die on the words "sustainable"...
Similar to other onchain yield strategies, the protocol channels earned yield to increase the $SOL Per Share (SPS) value while simultaneously funding operational costs. This dual mechanism ensures sustainable growth of the reserve while maintaining platform viability.