Authorities claim stricter platform controls are about protecting minors. But the data tells a different story.
Snapchat accounts for nearly 50% of reported grooming incidents. Compare that to WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram—all showing significantly higher risk profiles. Yet the regulatory focus keeps landing on one platform.
When numbers contradict the official narrative, it raises hard questions: Is child safety really the priority, or are there other pressures at play? How do we balance protection with preserving open discourse? And why do platforms face vastly different levels of scrutiny despite some carrying much greater documented risks?
These inconsistencies matter for how platforms evolve and what freedoms we preserve online.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainGossiper
· 1h ago
Data lies? No, it's the storytellers who are selectively deaf.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippa
· 20h ago
The data is all here, and you're still pretending? That's really laughable.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurner
· 01-14 16:40
The data is right here, and WhatsApp poses the highest risk but no one is managing it? It's obviously selective enforcement, the tactics are deep.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 01-13 19:59
The data is all here, and you're still pretending... It's really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-13 19:59
The data speaks for itself. Isn't the regulatory selective crackdown just revealing itself?
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larry
· 01-13 19:52
The data is right there; the official statements really can't stand scrutiny.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 01-13 19:44
actually... the data manipulation here is wild. snapchat at 50% but whatsapp *not* flagged equally? that's literally saying the trust assumptions in regulatory frameworks are completely broken. like, where's the cryptographic audit trail on these numbers? smh
Reply0
SigmaBrain
· 01-13 19:35
Data contradicts the official narrative, still practicing selective enforcement there.
Government Crackdown Claims Don't Add Up
Authorities claim stricter platform controls are about protecting minors. But the data tells a different story.
Snapchat accounts for nearly 50% of reported grooming incidents. Compare that to WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram—all showing significantly higher risk profiles. Yet the regulatory focus keeps landing on one platform.
When numbers contradict the official narrative, it raises hard questions: Is child safety really the priority, or are there other pressures at play? How do we balance protection with preserving open discourse? And why do platforms face vastly different levels of scrutiny despite some carrying much greater documented risks?
These inconsistencies matter for how platforms evolve and what freedoms we preserve online.