I have to say, the pricing strategy of the FOGO project is really quite frustrating. They directly sell the new tokens to all participants at a price of 0.035, but after such an operation, what is the value of participating in the subsequent new offerings?
Honestly, this kind of pricing approach is somewhat discouraging. Early investors and participants in the new offerings have no price difference, so why should they chase in the secondary market? From this perspective, the project's approach is indeed a bit unwise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationTherapist
· 01-16 10:20
0.035 this price is really outrageous, it immediately equalized everyone, what a joke.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 01-15 22:17
0.035 this price is really amazing. Giving everyone the same price, what is this about?
How can this operation attract people to take over on the secondary market?
The project team's thinking... no need to say more.
Early participants in the IPO didn't have any price difference, so who would still be willing to chase?
This kind of pricing logic really makes me speechless. Just forget about doing IPOs.
FOGO's operation is really not impressive, there's no attraction at all.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 01-15 19:32
Haha, they really haven't figured out the pricing logic. Without a price difference, no one will follow the trend.
FOGO's recent moves are truly disappointing. Early and late stages, calling it fair is nice, but honestly, it's unappealing.
They threw in all at 0.035, what kind of hype can secondary trading generate?
The project team needs to recharge their brains. If they don't leave some room for new investors to imagine, how can they set the rhythm?
Tsk, this is a classic case of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. Maximizing short-term profits has also killed the subsequent hype.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 01-15 01:53
It's the same old trick again. FOGO directly sets the same price for everyone, isn't this just a disguised way to cut the leeks?
0.035 for level one, and they still expect us to take the secondary? What are they thinking?
This kind of pricing is simply insulting everyone's intelligence. No wonder no one is optimistic.
The project team really hasn't thought it through. They can't even handle basic differentiated pricing.
Let's wait and see the secondary market break below the listing price. This logic just doesn't hold up.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHunter
· 01-13 12:50
ngl, if you look at the data on FOGO's tokenomics here—$0.035 across the board? technically speaking that's just... leaving money on the table. zero price discovery mechanism, zero incentive gradient between early and late participants. literally killing secondary market demand before it even starts lmao
Reply0
MidnightSeller
· 01-13 12:49
This pricing strategy is really disappointing; treating everyone equally actually makes no one want to buy.
FOGO's move is outrageous; there's no real difference between level one and level two, so why chase it?
0.035 is directly distributed to everyone; the project team really knows how to play.
Participants in the IPO are directly averaged out, making this deal a total loss.
With the same price, who still has enthusiasm? The project team's thinking...
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 01-13 12:47
lol FOGO's pricing is a governance attack on its own tokenomics... they literally erased all margin of disruption between early participants. zero incentive structure = protocol darwinism at its worst. why even bother with secondary markets when the primary failed to create scarcity pressure? classic incompetence dressed as fairness.
Reply0
RuntimeError
· 01-13 12:32
0.035 this price is directly smashing the order book, there's no difference at all, what's the point of playing?
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 01-13 12:24
Wow, this pricing is just too outrageous. If it's already flat from the start, what's the point of playing the IPO game?
FOGO's move this time is really brilliant. I was wondering why there's no hype at all.
0.035 directly distributed to everyone. The project team’s thinking is really...
Early and late stages at the same price, why should the secondary market go up? Laughing out loud.
That's why recently no one is chasing after new coin launches anymore. Who still believes in this stuff?
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLow
· 01-13 12:24
0.035 pricing and it's all out? The project team really... didn't think about the follow-up issues.
This operation is really disappointing, it's no different from early-stage IPOs, how can the secondary market be traded like this?
FOGO's approach is a bit outrageous, and they still want to attract people to enter?
If you ask me, this is a classic case of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs, extremely short-sighted.
With such a pricing strategy, no wonder the popularity is low, who would still follow?
I have to say, the pricing strategy of the FOGO project is really quite frustrating. They directly sell the new tokens to all participants at a price of 0.035, but after such an operation, what is the value of participating in the subsequent new offerings?
Honestly, this kind of pricing approach is somewhat discouraging. Early investors and participants in the new offerings have no price difference, so why should they chase in the secondary market? From this perspective, the project's approach is indeed a bit unwise.