Kalshi wins temporary shield as Tennessee court halts crackdown on sports markets

Source: Cryptonews Original Title: Kalshi wins temporary shield as Tennessee court halts crackdown on sports markets Original Link:

Overview

A federal judge has temporarily blocked Tennessee officials from enforcing a cease-and-desist order against prediction market operator Kalshi, according to court documents filed Monday.

U.S. District Judge Aleta Trauger granted Kalshi a temporary restraining order (TRO) that bars the Tennessee Sports Wagering Council and the state attorney general from applying state sports betting and gambling statutes to the platform while litigation continues. The ruling pauses Tennessee’s enforcement effort until at least Jan. 26, when a preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled.

Kalshi halted in Tennessee

In her order, Trauger stated that Kalshi is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims and would face irreparable harm if the state were allowed to proceed.

The TRO follows an enforcement action issued by Tennessee regulators days earlier. The Tennessee Sports Wagering Council instructed Kalshi, prediction market Polymarket, and a certain major crypto exchange to stop offering sports-related event contracts to state residents, void all open contracts, refund deposits, and wind down all in-state activity by Jan. 31.

Regulators warned that noncompliance could lead to civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation and criminal referrals for aggravated gambling promotion, according to the order.

Federal vs. State Authority

Kalshi challenged the order in federal court, arguing that federal derivatives law preempts state gambling statutes because the company is a U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)-regulated designated contract market (DCM). The company has made similar arguments in multiple states as local regulators seek to classify sports event contracts as gambling products rather than federally overseen derivatives.

Trauger’s ruling does not settle the preemption question but temporarily shields Kalshi from Tennessee’s enforcement effort.

Federal courts in New Jersey and Nevada have previously granted preliminary injunctions blocking those states from enforcing gambling laws against Kalshi. However, a Maryland court denied injunction relief last year, allowing regulators to move forward with enforcement.

The diverging outcomes reflect an unsettled legal environment, with courts evaluating whether sports-based event contracts should be treated as commodities subject to federal regulation or as gambling instruments within state jurisdiction.

Regulatory Divide

The CFTC has maintained that Kalshi’s operations fall under its exclusive purview as a DCM, while several states have expressed concerns about consumer protection, market integrity, and potential circumvention of state licensing frameworks, according to Tennessee’s cease-and-desist order.

The TRO preserves Kalshi’s ability to continue offering products to Tennessee residents while the court evaluates the case. The Jan. 26 hearing will determine whether the TRO becomes a longer-lasting preliminary injunction.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropBuffetvip
· 01-16 10:32
Haha, finally some good news. Kalshi has finally won a round this time, and Tennessee has temporarily stopped.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 01-15 03:11
On-chain data shows that Kalshi's contract activity has experienced significant fluctuations this week, and the ban in Tennessee has been temporarily blocked. From the code perspective, the impact of this temporary restraining order on subsequent deployments still needs to be observed. It is worth noting that the regulatory game in the prediction market sector has just begun; do not be fooled by the lifting of a single ban.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 01-14 06:24
Haha, Kalshi has managed to dodge a bullet this time, but I believe the landscape of prediction markets will be completely different three years from now. --- Tennessee's aunt really is unpredictable, but looking at historical cycles, every regulatory crackdown has eventually turned into a new opportunity. Let's just wait and see how things unfold. --- Temporary bans are of little use; the real battle is still ahead. But at least there's a breathing space, which is good for the entire industry. --- Speaking of which, it's quite an achievement for Kalshi to reach this point. That's just how the crypto world is—losing a few times is just tuition, after all, since three years is one cycle. --- The Tennessee court finally made some personnel changes; otherwise, the entire prediction market ecosystem would have been stifled. Now that's a real victory.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassinvip
· 01-13 12:49
Karshi's win this time, the Tennessee court's move to cut losses in time, otherwise the prediction market would be cut again...
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 01-13 12:48
No, Tennessee going this far is just too outrageous; at least the court is finally doing something about it.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObservervip
· 01-13 12:37
It's the same old story, the tug-of-war between regulators and project teams... However, Kalshi's win this time with the temporary injunction is somewhat interesting. The Tennessee court finally came out to say a fair word.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFanvip
· 01-13 12:32
The court has finally spoken, and Kalshi hasn't lost this round for now. Why is Tennessee still blocking the prediction market? I really don't quite understand...
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCryvip
· 01-13 12:30
Haha, Kalshi won again, this time Tennessee's bureaucrats got their nails hammered in.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 01-13 12:29
theoretically speaking, if we model this as a cross-chain regulatory arbitrage problem... kalshi just found their zk-proof that tennessee's cease-and-desist doesn't recursively encode across all jurisdictions. fascinating really—the interoperability vector between state enforcement and federal precedent is basically a broken bridge rn
Reply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)