Looking back at 2025, one thing stands out: narratives in crypto don't survive on hype alone anymore. They need institutional backing to thrive. Without major players anchoring the story, even compelling projects struggle to maintain momentum. Does this resonate with your market observations?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DataOnlooker
· 01-16 08:56
Institutional collusion is indeed powerful, but isn't that just centralization? Who will tell the retail investors' narrative story?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 01-14 17:41
Institutional involvement has truly changed the game. Small investors relying solely on faith can no longer hold up... It seems that projects without backing from large funds now have short lifespans.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemist
· 01-13 12:04
It's been obvious for a while now that projects without institutional backing can't survive... Relying solely on community hype won't work anymore.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 01-13 12:00
Institutions buy the dip aggressively, retail investors follow and get wrecked. This time, it's really clear.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108d
· 01-13 11:56
Institutional entry has indeed changed the game; the era of purely community-driven hype is truly over.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-13 11:49
Institutional entry indeed changes the game, and the hype from small retail investors can no longer drive the price of the coin.
Looking back at 2025, one thing stands out: narratives in crypto don't survive on hype alone anymore. They need institutional backing to thrive. Without major players anchoring the story, even compelling projects struggle to maintain momentum. Does this resonate with your market observations?