2026-01-13 11:34:22

Imagine if in the future, instead of supporting 10 chains, there are 100 chains. Would you really be willing to go through the process of choosing a cross-chain bridge, executing asset swaps, completing the chain jump, and then performing the final operation each time?

Honestly, most users might close the page by the second step. This is the most realistic user behavior in the multi-chain era—the higher the operational complexity, the lower the completion rate.

Seeing this pain point, I’ve recently been paying attention to some new cross-chain solutions and find that some projects’ approaches are worth considering. Instead of teaching users "how to perform cross-chain operations," it’s better to directly help users "simplify the entire cross-chain process"—making cross-chain a background logic, with only one step needed on the front end. This is the product form that the multi-chain ecosystem truly needs.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainFries

· 01-14 18:14

100 chains? Ha, I find even 10 chains troublesome now. I've long escaped the cross-chain hell.

View OriginalReply0

CompoundPersonality

· 01-14 08:58

100 Chains? Dude, are you trying to make us all learn programming? They really shut it down after the second step.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 01-13 22:53

100 Chains? Not many people probably use it, most have already given up.

View OriginalReply0

MidsommarWallet

· 01-13 20:42

One step done? I have to question my credibility... Can it really be this smooth?

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 01-13 12:04

100 chains, I just can't take it anymore, both steps are too much.

View OriginalReply0

FunGibleTom

· 01-13 11:53

100 chains? Haha, I really can't imagine. I'm already overwhelmed with just 10.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-13 11:52

100 chains? Haha, just thinking about it gives me a headache. I'm already annoyed enough with just 10 chains. This article is right. If the user experience is poor, people will just leave. No one has that much patience. The key is to hide it in the backend and not let us see those messy details.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_early

· 01-13 11:49

100 chains? I’ll just turn it off directly. Who has the patience for this? Really, now 10 chains are already enough to be annoying.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityLarry

· 01-13 11:42

Honestly, I give up on 100 chains... One-click cross-chain is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 01-13 11:35

100 chains? Wake up, now even 10 are annoying.