2026-01-13 11:28:00

High-performance blockchains are increasingly becoming the main battleground in public chain competition. From simply comparing TPS data, it has gradually evolved into a comprehensive contest over execution efficiency and the capacity to support financial applications.

Sei Network, through innovative parallel EVM technology, aims to create an execution layer tailored for high-frequency trading scenarios. The core question is: can such an architectural design truly support the financial ecosystem needs of the "on-chain Wall Street"?

Recently, a research institution released an in-depth analysis report that provides a panoramic overview from technical details to ecological applications. The report focuses on Sei's performance optimization, transaction confirmation speed, and DeFi application adaptation, highlighting the potential impact of such infrastructure-level innovations on the entire Web3 financial ecosystem.

SEI-1,39%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DancingCandles

· 3h ago

Can this thing really do something? I always feel like high-frequency trading sounds impressive, but what about actual users?

View OriginalReply0

FortuneTeller42

· 12h ago

Parallel EVM sounds good, but can it really withstand the real money from high-frequency trading? It also depends on how the ecosystem keeps up.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityJester

· 17h ago

Sei's parallel EVM sounds good, but can it really match the speed of CEX? It still feels like it's a bit short of the mark.

View OriginalReply0

Web3ExplorerLin

· 01-13 11:57

hypothesis: parallel evm is basically trying to solve the ancient problem of execution bottlenecks... but does sei actually deliver? 🤔 feels like every chain claims to be "the one" for high-frequency trading lol. let's see if the numbers match the hype or if it's just another performance theater tbh

Reply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 01-13 11:57

Parallel EVM sounds impressive, but whether it can actually perform well in practice depends on... However, Sei's architecture is indeed interesting; high-frequency trading scenarios are truly a necessity. --- On-chain Wall Street? First, get the gas fees reasonable before talking haha. --- Performance optimization is always a pain point for public chains. If Sei can truly maintain stable execution speeds, then this is worth paying serious attention to. --- What kind of in-depth report is this... These kinds of things are usually written to sound very good, but what about the actual results? --- The era of stacking TPS is over; now we focus on whether the real ecosystem can be used effectively. --- The issue with parallel processing is coordination cost. How does Sei handle this part? --- DeFi adaptation sounds simple, but the actual integration difficulty remains. We'll see how many leading projects are willing to jump on board later.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 01-13 11:56

Can Sei's parallel EVM really work? It seems to be hyped up a lot. Can it really withstand the wolves of on-chain Wall Street?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-13 11:47

Sei's parallel EVM sounds impressive, but let's see if it can survive the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiChef

· 01-13 11:43

Parallel EVM sounds good, but it only counts if it can run financial scenarios; otherwise, it's just hype.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 01-13 11:37

Another "On-Chain Wall Street," I'm already tired of hearing it. Do they really think the crypto world is a club for financial elites? Haha Sei's parallel EVM sounds good, but I bet fifty cents this time it will end with "something missing." In-depth report? I've memorized all the jargon from major research institutions, but in the end, it all comes down to whether we can survive the bear market.

View OriginalReply0