The liquidity design of BSC indeed has issues. Every time a large transaction enters, it immediately falls into slippage hell. The day before yesterday, I saw someone put in 90,000 USDT, and as soon as the trade was executed, market sentiment cooled down. This phenomenon is not uncommon—large capital inflows often become a signal to short. Instead of continuing to "transfuse" this inefficient liquidity mechanism, it's better to observe solutions from other high-efficiency public chains.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSpy
· 01-16 05:55
A 90,000 USDT investment directly triggers a short signal. How embarrassing is that?
View OriginalReply0
StableGenius
· 01-16 00:41
lmao the 90k usdt dump perfectly proves my point—bsc's liquidity model is fundamentally broken, as i predicted months ago. big money moving markets negatively? that's not a feature, it's a bug nobody wants to admit
Reply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 01-16 00:16
90,000 USDT invested in, but instead triggered a short signal—how absurd is that?
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 01-15 11:51
Really, the liquidity on BSC is like a sieve; big players enter and immediately run away.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 01-13 11:51
A sudden slippage when investing 90,000 instantly, this move is really quite aggressive.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 01-13 11:50
90,000 USDT entry actually causes a dump, how inefficient is that? Maybe try a different chain.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 01-13 11:49
The 90,000 USDT transaction I analyzed on the blockchain shows unusual activity in the whale wallet cluster. There’s definitely a story behind this.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 01-13 11:46
90,000 invested directly caused a bear market, this is the "magic" of BSC
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 01-13 11:41
BSC liquidity really underperforms; large investors pouring money in is actually a bearish signal? That logic is incredible.
The liquidity design of BSC indeed has issues. Every time a large transaction enters, it immediately falls into slippage hell. The day before yesterday, I saw someone put in 90,000 USDT, and as soon as the trade was executed, market sentiment cooled down. This phenomenon is not uncommon—large capital inflows often become a signal to short. Instead of continuing to "transfuse" this inefficient liquidity mechanism, it's better to observe solutions from other high-efficiency public chains.