2026-01-12 23:24:59

Remembering my previous opinion on a certain contract trader, I now feel a bit embarrassed. At first, I was quite skeptical about his trading skills, but recently his trading performance has indeed been impressive—claiming a 100% win rate might be a bit exaggerated, but consistent profits truly make people look at him differently.

He mainly trades contracts of RIVER, Binance Life, and PIPPIN. From both technical and fundamental perspectives, these coins do have some trading potential. Whether it's short-term fluctuations or medium-term trends, understanding the market and managing risks are essential.

A trader who can consistently profit must have a systematic methodology behind it. It's definitely not just luck that allows continuous earnings, no doubt about that. It seems we should not judge others' trading abilities lightly, as the market will always teach us how to do business.

PIPPIN-4,99%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OfflineNewbie

· 01-15 12:56

Haha, got slapped in the face. This feeling is really uncomfortable. Fine, I'll just be a humble leek farmer. Stable profits? I wouldn't even dare to think about it. I also watched that wave of RIVER; at the time, I thought it was just a trick to harvest leeks, but it turned out they really made money. Truly impressive, indeed impressive, but my hands are still too cheap. This is called market education. I'll just observe and learn carefully.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 01-14 00:16

Consistent profit is the real key; relying on luck is unreliable.

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 01-13 02:00

Damn, this guy is really making money. I was about to laugh at him before. Consistent profitability shows real skill, not just talk. I also saw that move in RIVER; there is indeed room for operation, but few can truly grasp it. The market really teaches people how to do things, straightforward but true. Luck might let you earn once at most; systematic methodology is the real key. Looks like I need to change my view on people. Those who make money quietly are the most formidable. Contracts really test psychology and discipline, and he clearly has both. Hats off to traders who consistently profit; there aren't many. I was really judging blindly before. Guess this is a face slap for me, haha.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityJanitor

· 01-12 23:55

Haha, this is the legendary "delicious aroma" moment Consistent profit is indeed more valuable than win rate, this guy understands

View OriginalReply0

StopLossMaster

· 01-12 23:46

Those who consistently make money are tough people; luck is not something you can rely on at all.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-12 23:45

100% win rate? Let me look at the data first... Generally speaking, such claims often require further verification. However, consistent profitability is indeed worth paying attention to. Here's an interesting finding — people who truly make money usually don't overhype their win rate itself.

View OriginalReply0

ZkProofPudding

· 01-12 23:41

Consistent profits are indeed impressive, but I still have some doubts about the 100% win rate unless he truly avoided all black swan events.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 01-12 23:36

Tsk, how does it feel to get slapped in the face, haha --- Consistent profit really depends on the system; this guy must have figured out the trick --- 100% win rate? I don’t believe you, but indeed, many people are making money --- That wave in RIVER was indeed something, but the risk is also quite high --- I’ve said it before, don’t judge recklessly; the market master will take care of you --- That’s the gap, understanding risk control and understanding how to make money are fundamentally different --- Contract stable profit? Can’t hold on anymore, everyone --- Looks like I need to learn this guy’s methodology properly; can’t operate blindly anymore

View OriginalReply0