Honestly, using just raw numbers to gauge account quality or content value feels pretty outdated now. AI has gotten sophisticated enough to actually grasp context—why are we still clinging to metrics that get gamed constantly? The real move is letting people build genuine trust over time, not hitting some arbitrary threshold that doesn't actually mean anything. Those vanity numbers tell you nothing about credibility, yet they keep driving how people get ranked and visibility. It's broken.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Liquidated_Larry
· 01-15 20:53
That's right, the whole thing about follower counts should have been thrown into the trash long ago.
---
Everyone can play the numbers game, but does that really mean anything?
---
It's ridiculous that people still rely on these虚数 to determine authority.
---
AI can see through it all, yet platforms still believe in数字—it's truly laughable.
---
I trust reputation built over time more than fake engagement.
---
The weighting algorithm needs to be changed; otherwise, it'll all be fake accounts.
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlocker
· 01-14 07:19
Digital vanity harms people; it should have been redefined by AI long ago.
View OriginalReply0
Blockwatcher9000
· 01-12 23:53
ngl, the follower count is completely outdated. To truly assess a person's credibility, you should look at their actual influence within the community.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 01-12 23:53
Numbers can be deceiving, but those who harvest the leek never lie.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-12 23:37
It seems to be discussing the issue of metric manipulation... but from a risk control perspective, this trust system itself is a high-leverage product, and once it collapses, it will trigger a chain of liquidations.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalker
· 01-12 23:35
People who follow the trend and inflate data should wake up; fake data has long been obsolete.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractRebel
· 01-12 23:33
Are you still looking at the number of followers? That's really impressive!
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-12 23:28
Honestly, the whole thing about follower counts should have been thrown into the trash long ago. It's really funny that people are still using it now.
Honestly, using just raw numbers to gauge account quality or content value feels pretty outdated now. AI has gotten sophisticated enough to actually grasp context—why are we still clinging to metrics that get gamed constantly? The real move is letting people build genuine trust over time, not hitting some arbitrary threshold that doesn't actually mean anything. Those vanity numbers tell you nothing about credibility, yet they keep driving how people get ranked and visibility. It's broken.